This vote has passed.
I'm pasting below the vote from Sachin Jose, which may have gotten
disconnected from the main thread.
After counting Sachin's vote and my own +1 vote, the final tally is 6
binding +1s and 3 non-binding +1s. Thank you to everyone who voted. We'll
proceed with the merge to t
+1
I was involved with some code reviews and the feature branch is looking
good. This is ready for merging to trunk.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Jing Zhao wrote:
> +1. ACL is a very useful feature. I reviewed some of the jiras and the
> code is in a very good shape.
>
> Thanks,
> -Jing
>
+1. ACL is a very useful feature. I reviewed some of the jiras and the
code is in a very good shape.
Thanks,
-Jing
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote:
> +1. I have been part of the design of this feature. Thanks to everyone who
> contributed to this feature development!
>
>
>
+1. I have been part of the design of this feature. Thanks to everyone who
contributed to this feature development!
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Chris Nauroth wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I would like to call a vote to merge HDFS ACLs from branch HDFS-4685 to
> trunk.
>
> HDFS ACLs provide s
+1
I have implemented and reviewed several parts of the features.
The design and implementation focus on providing high assurance the
security enforcement logic. I think the code is in good shape.
Thanks,
Haohui
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Vinayakumar B wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> This
+1 (non-binding)
This feature is important and was pending for long time. Thanks everyone for
all efforts.
I have been part of the implementation, reviewed patches and design document.
Good work guys.
Cheers,
Vinayakumar B.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Nauroth [mailto:cnaur...@hort
+1
It's very useful, Thanks for improve ACL features.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Chris Nauroth wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I would like to call a vote to merge HDFS ACLs from branch HDFS-4685 to
> trunk.
>
> HDFS ACLs provide support for finer-grained permissions on files than what
> use
