Hey Suresh,
Forgot to ask, when do you plan to check this into branch-23? Will
delay any merges that might conflict with this until you've committed
it.
Thanks,
Eli
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Eli Collins wrote:
> Hey Suresh,
>
> Went through the patch, looks good to me. Put a +1 on jira.
Hey Suresh,
Went through the patch, looks good to me. Put a +1 on jira.
Thanks,
Eli
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote:
> I have merged the change required for merging Namenode HA. I have also
> attached a release 23 patch in the jira HDFS-1623. Please take a look the
> attac
+1
I applied the patch to branch-0.23. It compiles just fine. I built a
distribution tar, deployed it to a 4-node cluster, and ran some smoke tests
with HA enabled. All seemed good.
I also ran the following unit tests, which should exercise the relevant HA
code:
TestOfflineEditsViewer,TestHDFSCo
I have merged the change required for merging Namenode HA. I have also
attached a release 23 patch in the jira HDFS-1623. Please take a look the
attached patch and let me know if that looks good.
Regards,
Suresh
+1. Thanks Suresh, those lgtm
On Wednesday, March 7, 2012, Suresh Srinivas wrote:
> Thanks Eli for the list. I have merged the bugs you identified to 0.23. I
> am in the process of merging HA change. I have several conflicts, stemming
> from the changes that are no in 0.23. Pushing following ji
Likewise, +1 to merging all of those. HADOOP-7717 and HDFS-2430 are hard
requirements for the HA work, and the rest of those seem like strict
improvements to me. If they make the merge easier, then by all means do it.
I don't think you need to wait a day, either. I doubt anyone will object to
merg
+1 on merging all of those
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Suresh Srinivas wrote:
> Thanks Eli for the list. I have merged the bugs you identified to 0.23. I
> am in the process of merging HA change. I have several conflicts, stemming
> from the changes that are no in 0.23. Pushing following jira
Thanks Eli for the list. I have merged the bugs you identified to 0.23. I
am in the process of merging HA change. I have several conflicts, stemming
from the changes that are no in 0.23. Pushing following jiras to 0.23 will
make the merge easier. I believe these are mostly straight forward changes:
Hey Suresh,
+1 Sounds great. Thanks for volunteering!
You'll probably want to merge HDFS-1580, HDFS-1765, HDFS-2158,
HDFS-2188, HDFS-2334, HDFS-2476, HDFS-2477, and HDFS-2495 to branch-23
first as these conflict and the patch will contain a bunch of non-HA
stuff.
Thanks,
Eli
On Fri, Mar 2, 20
+1, this'll be great. The sooner the better. Please let me know if I can be
of any help.
Thanks a lot for volunteering to do this, Suresh.
--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote:
> Namenode HA (HDFS-1623) feature is now in trunk (ya
Awesome! +1!
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 2, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote:
> Namenode HA (HDFS-1623) feature is now in trunk (yay!). It adds support for
> namenode high availability with active and standby namenodes, with manual
> failover. I propose merging this feature to 0.23 branch
Namenode HA (HDFS-1623) feature is now in trunk (yay!). It adds support for
namenode high availability with active and standby namenodes, with manual
failover. I propose merging this feature to 0.23 branch. Recently Nicholas
merged protocol buffers/wire compatibility changes to 0.23. Merging
Nameno
12 matches
Mail list logo
