Hey Todd, Ivan,
I've committed the patch for 1473.
Thanks,
Eli
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There's a patch up for 1473 now. If we can get a +1 we can commit this and
> move on to the next steps in some of these projects.
>
> Thanks
> -Todd
>
> On Thu, Nov 1
Hi all,
There's a patch up for 1473 now. If we can get a +1 we can commit this and
move on to the next steps in some of these projects.
Thanks
-Todd
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote:
> This patch looks really good. It shouldn't affect our refactoring too much
> and will actua
Glancing at 1473, it seems reasonable, but of course should get a
thorough review. HDFS-1465 will impact and essentially replace all the
saving/loading code, so whether the it does so with the code's current
state or with 1473's refactoring, it doesn't matter much. 1473 will
probably make it
This patch looks really good. It shouldn't affect our refactoring too much and
will actually make things a lot easier for the next part (breaking the circular
dependency between namesystem and fsimage).
-Ivan
On 18 Nov 2010, at 02:27, Todd Lipcon wrote:
I put up a sketch of a patch for 1473. I
I put up a sketch of a patch for 1473. It compiles and passes at least a
couple of the unit tests, but more work to be done on it. Would appreciate
comments from this crowd if the new classes seem like good divisions.
-Todd
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2
Sure, moving this discussion to the public list. It was only a private
discussion because I find people tend to notice messages in their inbox more
than on JIRA or a list ;-)
-Todd
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> Can this message please be re-posted to the hdfs-dev list, s
