Hi Arun,
I apologize for the late response.
If the problems are recognized correctly, +1 for the release(non-binding).
* Ran examples on pseudo distributed cluster.
* Ran tests.
* Built from source.
Let's fix the problems at the target version(2.4.1).
Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at
+1 binding
Verified binaries, ran from binary on single node cluster. Tested some HDFS
clis and wordcount.
sanjay
On Apr 7, 2014, at 9:52 AM, Suresh Srinivas wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified the signatures and hashes for both src and binary tars. Built from
> the source, the binary distrib
another belated +1 binding
-set mvn to pull in the 2.4.0 artifacts
-rebuilt my slider YARN code. Only compile failure was caused in our custom
AmFilterInitializer not compiling due to YARN-1553 dropping a static
isSecure() method -switched to
inlining WebAppUtils.getHttpSchemePrefix(conf) to cre
Here's my late +1, was just finishing up looking at the release.
- Verified signatures and digests
- Examined LICENSE file
- Installed binary distribution, ran some sample MapReduce jobs and
examined logs and job history
- Built from source
Jason
On 04/07/2014 03:04 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
With 11 +1s (4 binding) and no -1s the vote passes. Thanks to everyone who
tried out the release and passed their feedback along.
I'll send a note out once I actually get the bits out and the site updated etc.
thanks,
Arun
On Mar 31, 2014, at 2:22 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've c
07, 2014 9:55 AM
To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org;
yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.4.0
+1 (Binding)
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Suresh Srinivas
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Ver
+1 (Binding)
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Suresh Srinivas wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified the signatures and hashes for both src and binary tars. Built from
> the source, the binary distribution and the documentation. Started a single
> node cluster and tested the following:
> # Started H
+1 (binding)
Verified the signatures and hashes for both src and binary tars. Built from
the source, the binary distribution and the documentation. Started a single
node cluster and tested the following:
# Started HDFS cluster, verified the hdfs CLI commands such ls, copying
data back and forth, v
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ran tests and confirmed that some tests(TestSymlinkLocalFSFileSystem)
> fail.
The log of the test failure is as follows:
>
> https://gist.github.com/oza/9965197
>
> Should we fix or disable the feature?
>
Symlinks is still not compl
Gera,
Apologies for the late response, I decided to take the weekend off! *smile*
Thanks for the feedback, I took a look at your list and here are some
observations:
On Apr 4, 2014, at 5:06 PM, Gera Shegalov wrote:
> I built the release from the rc tag, enabled timeline history service and
+1 for another rc. There have been quite a few issues found (handful
marked blocker) and this is only the first release candidate, seems
like the point of having multiple release candidates is to iterate
with another one that addresses the major issues found with the
previous one.
On Fri, Apr 4,
I built the release from the rc tag, enabled timeline history service and
ran a sleep job on a pseudo-distributed cluster.
I encourage another rc, for 2.4.0 (non-binding)
1) Despite the discussion on YARN-1701, timeline AHS still sets
yarn.timeline-service.generic-application-history.fs-history-s
Arun,
Do you mean you will cut another RC for 2.4?
Sent from my iPhone5s
> On 2014年4月5日, at 3:50, "Arun C. Murthy" wrote:
>
> Thanks for helping Tsuyoshi. Pls mark them as Blockers and set the
> fix-version to 2.4.1.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Arun
>
>
>> On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:38 PM, Tsuyosh
Thanks for helping Tsuyoshi. Pls mark them as Blockers and set the fix-version
to 2.4.1.
Thanks again.
Arun
> On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:38 PM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Updated a test result log based on the result of 2.4.0-rc0:
> https://gist.github.com/oza/9965197
>
> IMO, there are
Hi,
Updated a test result log based on the result of 2.4.0-rc0:
https://gist.github.com/oza/9965197
IMO, there are some blockers to be fixed:
* MAPREDUCE-5815(TestMRAppMaster failure)
* YARN-1872(TestDistributedShell failure)
* HDFS: TestSymlinkLocalFSFileSystem failure on Linux (I cannot find
JI
Hi,
Ran tests and confirmed that some tests(TestSymlinkLocalFSFileSystem) fail.
The log of the test failure is as follows:
https://gist.github.com/oza/9965197
Should we fix or disable the feature?
Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've creat
Azurry, can you file the RM-failover related bug as a JIRA? I'm going
to reproduce it in my local.
Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Azuryy wrote:
> Did you tested RM failover on Hive? There is bug.
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone5s
>
>> On 2014年4月4日, at 2:12, Xuan Gong wrote:
>>
>>
HDFS-6180 seems to be a blocker of 2.4. I'll post a patch later today.
~Haohui
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Azuryy wrote:
> Did you tested RM failover on Hive? There is bug.
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone5s
>
> > On 2014年4月4日, at 2:12, Xuan Gong wrote:
> >
> > +1 non-binding
> >
> > Built from
Did you tested RM failover on Hive? There is bug.
Sent from my iPhone5s
> On 2014年4月4日, at 2:12, Xuan Gong wrote:
>
> +1 non-binding
>
> Built from source code, tested on a single node cluster. Successfully ran a
> few MR sample jobs.
> Tested RM failover while job is running.
>
> Thanks
>
+1 non-binding
I built from source code, and setup a single node non-secure cluster with
almost the default configurations and ran a number of MR example jobs and
distributedshell jobs. I verified the generic and the per-framework (DS job
only) historic information has been persisted, and such inf
+1 non-binding
Built from git. Started with 120 node 2.3.0 cluster with security and
non HA, ran upgrade (non rolling) to 2.4.0. Confirmed fsimage is OK and
HDFS successfully upgraded. Also successfully ran some pig jobs and
mapreduce examples. Haven't found any issues yet but will continue
tes
Hi Sandy,
Please find "TimelineServer.apt.vm".
Thanks,
Zhijie
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Sandy Ryza wrote:
> Thanks Zhijie - where is that document located?
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Zhijie Shen
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sandy,
> >
> > Application History Server (we prefer to cal
Hi Sandy,
Application History Server (we prefer to call it Timeline Server instead
now) is going to be shipped in 2.4 without security. I've already wrote a
document about what it is, what's the current status, and how to config and
start it. Via the document, hopefully the users are clear about t
Folks,
I've created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.4.0 that I would like to
get released.
The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.4.0-rc0
The RC tag in svn is here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.4.0-rc0
The maven artifacts are
24 matches
Mail list logo
