Thanks Doug for the clarification. Thanks to others who votes :-). I have
created the branch HDFS-1052 off of trunk.
On 8/20/10 2:50 PM, "Doug Cutting" wrote:
On 08/19/2010 05:32 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote:
> Do we need a vote for creating a development branch?
I don't think a vote is r
On 08/19/2010 05:32 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote:
Do we need a vote for creating a development branch?
I don't think a vote is required. I agree that any committer should be
able to create a branch.
Note however, that, if a committer were to wish to create a branch that
alters, e.g., t
+1. Look forward to the feature completion.
Hairong
On 8/19/10 10:00 PM, "Dhruba Borthakur" wrote:
> +1
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 19, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Suresh Srinivas
> wrote:
>
>> I am planning to create a new branch from the trunk for the work
>> related to HDFS-1052 - HDFS scal
+1 good idea
2010/8/20 Dhruba Borthakur
> +1
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Aug 19, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Suresh Srinivas
> wrote:
>
> I am planning to create a new branch from the trunk for the work related to
>> HDFS-1052 - HDFS scalability using multiple namenodes/namespaces. Please see
>> the
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 19, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Suresh Srinivas
wrote:
I am planning to create a new branch from the trunk for the work
related to HDFS-1052 - HDFS scalability using multiple namenodes/
namespaces. Please see the jira for more details. Doing the
development in a sep
st 19, 2010 5:07:14 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] New branch for HDFS-1052 development
>
> I am planning to create a new branch from the trunk for the work related to
>HDFS-1052 - HDFS scalability using multiple namenodes/namespaces. Please see
>the
>jira for more details. Doing the
I am planning to create a new branch from the trunk for the work related to
HDFS-1052 - HDFS scalability using multiple namenodes/namespaces. Please see
the jira for more details. Doing the development in a separate branch will
reduce the churn on the trunk. The development will be done incremen
