+1 (binding)
We have made some great progress in the last few days on some of the issues I
raised.
I have posted a summary of the followup items that are needed on the Jira today.
I am +1ing expecting the team will complete Items 1 (distcp/cp) and 2
(webhdfs) promptly. Before we publish trans
With 4 binding +1s, 3 non-binding +1s, no -1s, the vote passes. Thanks
everyone who gave feedback at this stage, particularly Sanjay and Suresh.
I should add that this vote will run for the standard 7 days for a
non-release vote, so will close at 12PM Pacific on August 15th.
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 a
+1 (binding)
This is a very important feature. I have gone through the design in detail.
I have also discussed the details of design and needed as follow up with
the team (I will post the details in the jira). The follow up items should
not hold up merging this feature to trunk and can be done in
While I was originally skeptical of transparent encryption, I like the value
proposition of transparent encryption. HDFS has several layers, protocols and
tools. While the HDFS core part seems to be well done in the Jira, inserting
the matching transparency in the other tools or protocols need
+1 (non-binding)
I've actively worked on developing and reviewing this feature and am
happy to see it in its current state. I believe it is ready to be merged.
Charles
Nice work guys!
+1 for merge.
Regards,
Uma
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Andrew Wang
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to merge the fs-encryption branch to trunk.
> Development of this feature has been ongoing since March on HDFS-6134 and
> HADOOP-10150, totally approximately 50
...@cloudera.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2014 3:18 PM
To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge fs-encryption branch to trunk
+1 (non-binding)
I have been testing encryption in conjunction with the Hadoop KMS and right now
the integration looks good
+1 (non-binding)
I have been testing encryption in conjunction with the Hadoop KMS and right
now the integration looks good to merge to trunk. I also tested on
platforms with outdated openssl and no encryption configs to verify no
regressions when users don't want to use this feature.
Thanks to t
+1
I've been following the work closely, specially on the crypto streams and
key handling, and providing dev support as well.
Kudos to Andrew, Yi and Charles for doing the bulk of the work.
thx
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Andrew Wang
wrote:
> I should add that this vote will run for the
I should add that this vote will run for the standard 7 days for a
non-release vote, so will close at 12PM Pacific on August 15th.
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Wang
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to merge the fs-encryption branch to trunk.
> Development of this feature
On 8/8/2014 2:45 PM, Andrew Wang wrote:
With that, here's my +1 to merge this to trunk.
1 down, 2 to go.
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to merge the fs-encryption branch to trunk.
Development of this feature has been ongoing since March on HDFS-6134 and
HADOOP-10150, totally approximately 50 commits.
The fs-encryption branch introduces support for transparent, end-to-end
encryption within an "encry
12 matches
Mail list logo
