Closing out the JIRAs as "Auto Closed" or "Closed due to Inactivity" seems
reasonable to me. For branch-1, we can be more aggressive. We should
probably do the same less aggressively for other branches too.
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> +1
>
> Arun
>
> On May 8, 2015, a
+1
Arun
On May 8, 2015, at 10:41 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
>
> May we declare this branch dead and just close bugs (but not
> necessarily concepts, ideas, etc) with won’t fix? I don’t think anyone has
> any intention of working on the 1.3 release, especially given that 1.2.1 w
I would be -1 to declaring the branch dead just yet. There have been 7
commits to that branch this year. I know this isn't comparable to trunk or
branch-2, but it is not negligible either.
I propose we come up with a policy for deprecating past major release
branches. May be, something along the l
May we declare this branch dead and just close bugs (but not
necessarily concepts, ideas, etc) with won’t fix? I don’t think anyone has any
intention of working on the 1.3 release, especially given that 1.2.1 was Aug
2013 ….
I guess we need a PMC member to declare a vo
I think it would be fine to "auto-close" most remaining branch-1 issues
even if the branch is still formally considered alive. I don't expect us
to create a new 1.x release unless a security vulnerability or critical
bug forces it. Closing all non-critical issues would match with the
reality that
