Thanks everyone. I've opened a VOTE thread..
@Carlo
Interesting idea to support Kubernates API. Definitely makes sense. My
understanding is that we can emulate specification for a k8 POD within our
scheme of things by assigning the same source tag to a set of scheduling
requests.
Ill dig in to thi
Also I think this can help us close the gap (and surpass) Kubernetes for
complex services (at least for resource management)... It would be awesome
to have a compatibility layer so folks can run Kubernetes natives apps on a
yarn cluster.
On Jan 26, 2018 1:32 AM, "Carlo Aldo Curino" wrote:
+1.
+1. I didn't runs tests, but I like the design, and speaking with ops teams
that operate large clusters I hear this is a feature they think is going to
help a lot, so I am very supportive of this effort.
On Jan 25, 2018 7:08 PM, "Konstantinos Karanasos"
wrote:
> Thanks for starting the thread Ar
Thanks for starting the thread Arun, +1 from me too.
Konstantinos
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 18:54 Weiwei Yang wrote:
> +1, thanks for getting to this milestone Arun.
> I’ve done some basic validations on a 4 nodes cluster, with some general
> affinity/anti-affinty/cardinality constraints, it work
+1, thanks for getting to this milestone Arun.
I’ve done some basic validations on a 4 nodes cluster, with some general
affinity/anti-affinty/cardinality constraints, it worked. I’ve also reviewed
the doc, it’s in good shape and very illustrative.
Thanks.
--
Weiwei
On 26 Jan 2018, 10:44 AM +08
+1.
Thanks Arun.
I did manual testing for check affinity and anti-affinity features with
placement allocator. Also checked SLS to see any performance regression,
and there are not much difference as Arun mentioned.
Thanks all the folks for working on this. Kudos!
- Sunil
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018
Thanks Arun
+1,
Best,
Wangda
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 7:46 AM, Arun Suresh wrote:
> Hello yarn-dev@
>
> We feel that the YARN-6592 dev branch mostly in shape to be merged into
> trunk. This branch adds support for placing containers in YARN using rich
> placement constraints. For example, this
Hello yarn-dev@
We feel that the YARN-6592 dev branch mostly in shape to be merged into
trunk. This branch adds support for placing containers in YARN using rich
placement constraints. For example, this can be used by applications to
co-locate containers on a node or rack (*affinity *constraint),
