Manoj, thanks for the comments.
I added the consolidated branch patch to HDFS-10467 (CC Brahma).
Regarding the comparison with existing approaches, I'd say that the real
comparison is ViewFs (already in the docs).
This is complementary to the current HDFS federation; you have multiple
namespaces
Agreed on this not being the cleanest..
Just filed it this morning: HDFS-12384.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Andrew Wang
wrote:
> v) mvn install (and package) is failing with following error
>>
>> [INFO] Adding ignore: *
>> [WARNING] Rule 1: org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.BanDuplicateC
>
> v) mvn install (and package) is failing with following error
>
> [INFO] Adding ignore: *
> [WARNING] Rule 1: org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.BanDuplicateClasses
> failed with message:
> Duplicate classes found:
>
> Found in:
> org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-client-minicluster:jar:3.0.0-
> b
>>*
>>
>>
>>
>> org.apache.hadoop
>> hadoop-client-minicluster
>>
>>*
>>
*
>
>
>
>
> Please correct me If I am wrong.
>
>
> --Brahma Reddy Battula
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Douglas [mailto:cdoug...@apache.org]
> Sent: 25 August 2017 06:37
> To: Andrew Wang
> Cc: Iñigo Go
oug...@apache.org]
Sent: 25 August 2017 06:37
To: Andrew Wang
Cc: Iñigo Goiri; hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org; su...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Merge HDFS-10467 to (Router-based federation) trunk
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Andrew Wang wrote:
> Do you mind holding this until 3.1? Same re
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Andrew Wang wrote:
> Do you mind holding this until 3.1? Same reasoning as for the other branch
> merge proposals, we're simply too late in the 3.0.0 release cycle.
That wouldn't be too dire.
That said, this has the same design and impact as YARN federation.
Spec
Do you mind holding this until 3.1? Same reasoning as for the other branch
merge proposals, we're simply too late in the 3.0.0 release cycle.
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> I'd definitely support merging this to trunk. The implementation is
> almost entirely outside of H
I'd definitely support merging this to trunk. The implementation is
almost entirely outside of HDFS and, as Inigo detailed, has been
tested at scale. The branch is in a functional state with
documentation and tests. -C
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Iñigo Goiri wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> We would
Hi all,
We would like to open a discussion on merging the Router-based Federation
feature to trunk.
Last week, there was a thread about which branches would go into 3.0 and
given that YARN federation is going, this might be a good time for this to
be merged too.
We have been running "Router-b
10 matches
Mail list logo
