age -
From: "Colin P. McCabe"
To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2015 2:43:29 PM
Subject: Re: HDFS 2.6.0 upgrade ends with missing blocks
Hi dlmarion,
In general, any upgrade process we do will consume disk space, because
it's creating hardlinks and
I went back and read through the comments in HDFS-6482 and found that the
restrictions (question #2 below) have already been documented at
https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/FAQ#On_an_individual_data_node.2C_how_do_you_balance_the_blocks_on_the_disk.3F
I will update HDFS-1312 with this information
I recently upgraded from CDH 5.1.2 to CDH 5.3.0. I know, contact Cloudera, but
this is actually a generic issue. After the upgrade I brought up the DNs and
after all of them had checked in I ended up with missing blocks. I tracked this
down in the DN logs to an error at startup where the DN is
Arun,
Any possibility of getting HDFS-6376 committed and backported into 2.5?
Dave Marion
-Original Message-
From: Arun C Murthy [mailto:a...@hortonworks.com]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 12:40 PM
To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org;
yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org;
Thanks for the reply. I was following the instructions found at [1]. I'm not a
committer. Is there a way to communicate to which version I would like the
patch backported? Would I set the target version to 2.4.1 and the fix version
to the version of trunk?
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/How
I’m trying to complete this issue, but I am unable to get it to build in
Jenkins. The patch applies for my locally. Is there a known issue at this time
with the 2.4 branch build? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
- Dave
