[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Milind Bhandarkar reopened HDFS-257:
Yes, it does.
Reopening.
> Does a big delete starve other clie
11, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Milind Bhandarkar
wrote:
> If HDFS is released independently, with its own RPC and protocol versions,
> features such as pluggable namespaces will not have to wait for the next
> mega-release of the entire stack.
The plan as I understand it is to eventually be able t
-release of the entire stack.
Would love to hear what hdfs developers think about this.
- milind
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 10, 2013, at 20:31, Milind Bhandarkar
> wrote:
>
> ( this message is not intended for specific folks, by mistake, but for all
> the hdfs-dev list, deliberate
( this message is not intended for specific folks, by mistake, but for all the
hdfs-dev list, deliberately;)
Hello Folks,
I do not want to scratch the already bleeding wounds, and want to resolve these
issues amicably, without causing a big inter-vendor confrontation.
So, these are the facts,
theories and employer bashing, adding details such as
> this is what is useful to this forum!
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:09 AM, Milind Bhandarkar > wrote:
>
>> No, Steve, I meant exactly what I wrote. One day, when you are here, Let's
>> meet in the same ch
1:45, Steve Loughran wrote:
>
> On 9 October 2013 01:57, Milind Bhandarkar wrote:
>
>> Yes, we have. It works very well, but it is considered too niche by folks
>> who insist on buying the least capable hardware for their test clusters,
>> and therefore, recommend such und
o get there for Open Source Hadoop
implementations, but believe me, every Hadoop vendor based off of open
source Hadoop is incorporating new network architectures in their
proprietary distro. We were there first. That's all.
- milind
---
Milind Bhandarkar
Chief Scientist
Pivotal
+1-650-523-3858
Yes, we have. It works very well, but it is considered too niche by folks who
insist on buying the least capable hardware for their test clusters, and
therefore, recommend such underpowered clusters to customers as well.
- milind
> On Oct 8, 2013, at 16:49, Yasin Celik wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
Thanks for all the feedback, folks.
I have created a jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5324.
Let us continue detailed discussions there.
- Milind
---
Milind Bhandarkar
Chief Scientist
Pivotal
+1-650-523-3858 (W)
+1-408-666-8483 (C)
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:50 PM, sanjay Radia
Milind Bhandarkar created HDFS-5324:
---
Summary: Make Namespace implementation pluggable in the namenode
Key: HDFS-5324
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5324
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Getting back to the technical discussion: based on this proposal email that I
sent, I came to know, from Sanjay Radia, of a summer intern project at
Hortonworks that implemented namespace using LevelDB. We discussed it on
personal email today, and agreed that these two efforts were still orthogo
had Vinod's name in it, I
checked again to see that in my address book, Vinod's email is entered as
hdfs-dev automatically), and I realized that today after I checked hdfs-dev
list. I apologize for the mishap.
Let's keep the discussions technical here.
- milind
---
Milind B
, and co-exist with it.
- Milind
---
Milind Bhandarkar
Chief Scientist
Pivotal
+1-650-523-3858 (W)
+1-408-666-8483 (C)
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Bobby Evans wrote:
> Putting all conspiracy theories aside :). Any way we decided to scale the
> name node is going to have limit
to how best to
handle switching from one NS implementation to another.
The NS interfaces are currently private. However, we can make them as
LimitedPrivate with "extensions" as the project.
Thoughts ?
- Milind
---
Milind Bhandarkar
Chief Scientist
Pivotal
+1-650-523-3858 (W)
+1-408-6
Vinod
On Oct 6, 2013, at 9:35 AM, Milind Bhandarkar wrote:
> Federation is orthogonal with Pluggable Namespaces. That is, one can
> use Federation if needed, even while a distributed K-V store is used
> on the backend.
>
> Limitations of Federated namenode for scaling namespace are
x27;t that the same as this effortt?
Thanks,
+Vinod
On Oct 6, 2013, at 9:35 AM, Milind Bhandarkar wrote:
> Federation is orthogonal with Pluggable Namespaces. That is, one can
> use Federation if needed, even while a distributed K-V store is used
> on the backend.
>
> Limitations o
:18 AM, "Milind Bhandarkar"
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Exec Summary: For the last couple of months, we, at Pivotal, along
> with a couple of folks in the community have been working on making
> Namespace implementation in the namenode pluggable. We have
> demonstrated that
separately.
- Milind
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Purtell [mailto:apurt...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 11:23 AM
To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Pluggable Namespace
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Milind Bhandarkar <
mbhandar...@gopivotal.com>
. We aim to propose a change in such interfaces into which
FSNameSystem is tightly coupled.
- Milind
---
Milind Bhandarkar
Chief Scientist
Pivotal
,
- milind
---
Milind Bhandarkar
Chief Scientist
Pivotal
+1-650-523-3858 (W)
+1-408-666-8483 (C)
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Erik Paulson wrote:
> Hello all -
>
> As part of a side project, I've been interested in HDFS benchmarking,
> particularly of the Namenode. To get
ning messages in the
> documentation on when people should be using it.. but at least they could get
> a regular build
> and run it.
>
> so.. the question to the experts.. can the append patch be made into a
> configuration option such that if people don't have it enabled it
ct: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: scripts
Affects Versions: 0.20.2
Environment: All
Reporter: Milind Bhandarkar
Assignee: Robert Chansler
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 0.20.3
The help message printed by &
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: name-node
Environment: All
Reporter: Milind Bhandarkar
Assignee: Sanjay Radia
owner and group of a file/directory, and namespace/diskspace quota for a
directory are mutable
23 matches
Mail list logo
