HDFS-909 left us with a corrupted HDFS
Cosmin
On 1/28/10 4:14 AM, "Andrew Purtell" wrote:
> So the list of HDFS issues for next 0.20.x or 0.21 most relevant to HBase
> stability I have is:
>
>127
>200 (well, hflush)
>630
>793
>
>
> Sound about right? Anything important I'm m
Steve,
A DoS could not be done using excludedNodes.
The blacklisting takes place only at DFSClientLevel. The NN will return a
list of block locations that excludes the nodes the client decided. This
list isn't persisted anywhere on the server. So if a client excludes the
entire set of DNs other
+1
On 1/22/10 3:24 AM, "Andrew Purtell" wrote:
> +1
>
> This makes an observed big difference for stability of small/test clusters.
>
> I second Ryan's specific point about stability of small clusters being
> important.
>
> - Andy
>
>
> On Thu Jan 21st, 2010 2:46 PM PST Ryan Rawson wro
/HDFS-909
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Bug
Components: name-node
Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0
Environment: CentOS
Reporter: Cosmin Lehene
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0
closing the edits log file
Hi,
I keep getting different tests failing with each run on
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/Hdfs/job/Hdfs-Patch-h5.grid.sp2.y
ahoo.net/
For example builds 192 and 193 are applying the same patch however each
fails differently:
192:
org.apache.hadoop.fs.loadGenerator.TestLoadGenerator.
+1
Cosmin
On 12/15/09 10:44 AM, "Lars George" wrote:
> +1
>
> Lars
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans
> wrote:
>
>> +1 for 0.21.0
>>
>> J-D
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Andrew Purtell
>> wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 3:54 PM, stack
Hi,
I was trying to make a patch and looking over the Hadoop guidelines for code at
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/CodeReviewChecklist, trying to follow the
conventions.
Looking through code I found a few "patterns", however, these differ even in
the same class sometimes. Here's a collection of
