+1 (binding)
Arun
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 4:44 PM -0700, "Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli"
mailto:vino...@apache.org>> wrote:
Hi all,
I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
The RC tag in git is: r
Colin,
Do you have a list of incompatible changes other than the shell-script
rewrite? If we do have others we'd have to fix them anyway for the current plan
on hadoop-3.x right? So, I don't see the difference?
Arun
From: Colin P. McCabe
Sent: Monday,
Steve,
From: Steve Loughran
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 2:15 PM
To: mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org;
common-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Hadoop 3.x: what about shipping trunk as a 2.x release in 2
Over the last few days, we have had lots of discussions that have intertwined
several major themes:
# When/why do we make major Hadoop releases?
# When/how do we move to major JDK versions?
# To a lesser extent, we have debated another theme: what do we do about trunk?
For now, let's park
Awesome, looks like we can just do this in a compatible manner - nothing else
on the list seems like it warrants a (premature) major release.
Thanks Vinod.
Arun
From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 2:30 PM
To: common-...@hadoop.ap
Andrew,
Thanks for bringing up this discussion.
I'm a little puzzled for I feel like we are rehashing the same discussion from
last year - where we agreed on a different course of action w.r.t switch to
JDK7.
IAC, breaking compatibility for hadoop-3 is a pretty big cost - particularly
for
Sounds good, thanks for the help Vinod!
Arun
From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2015 11:43 AM
To: Hadoop Common; Jason Lowe; Arun Murthy
Subject: Re: 2.7 status
Agreed. How about we roll an RC end of this week? As a Java 7+ release
My bad, been sorted distracted.
I agree, we should just roll fwd a 2.7 ASAP with all the goodies.
What sort of timing makes sense? 2 week hence?
thanks,
Arun
From: Jason Lowe
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 8:11 AM
To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org
Subje
Folks,
With hadoop-2.6 out it's time to think ahead.
As we've discussed in the past, 2.6 was the last release which supports JDK6.
I'm thinking it's best to try get 2.7 out in a few weeks (maybe by the
holidays) with just the switch to JDK7 (HADOOP-10530) and possibly
support for JDK-1.8 (as a r
Duh!
$ chmod a+r *
Please try now. Thanks!
Arun
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA
wrote:
> Hi Arun,
>
> Could you confirm the link and permission to the files is correct? I
> got a following error:
>
>
> Forbidden
> You don't have permission to access
> /~acmurthy/hadoop-2.6.0-
as already indicated
>> on
>>>>> the dev mailing list. Hopefully HDFS-6581 gets ready sooner. Both of
>>> these
>>>>> features are being in development for sometime.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Andrew Wang <
>
Looks like most of the content is in and hadoop-2.6 is shaping up nicely.
I'll create branch-2.6 by end of the week and we can go from there to
stabilize it - hopefully in the next few weeks.
Thoughts?
thanks,
Arun
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> With hadoo
Sorry, coming to discussion late.
We all agreed that 2.6 would the *last* release supporting JDK6 and
hadoop-2.7 would drop support for JDK6. We could easily do 2.7 right after
2.6 (maybe with few critical bug-fixes) with the defining feature of 2.7
being *JDK7 only*. I've checked with HBase, Pig
I suggest we do a 2.5.1 (with potentially other bug fixes) rather than fix
existing tarballs.
thanks,
Arun
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Kambatla
wrote:
> Hi devs
>
> Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs don't
> have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the to
Alejandro,
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur
wrote:
> After reading this thread and thinking a bit about it, I think it should be
> OK such move up to JDK7 in Hadoop 2 for the following reasons:
>
> * Existing Hadoop 2 releases and related projects are running
> on JDK7 in p
Thanks everyone. I'll start a vote tmrw if there are no objections.
Arun
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jitendra Pandey
wrote:
> +1, sounds good!
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Andrew Wang
> wrote:
>
> > +1 here as well, let's do a vote thread (for 7 days, maybe for the last
> > t
Akira,
Waiting for one more issue, stay tuned.
thanks,
Arun
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Akira AJISAKA
wrote:
> Hi Arun,
>
> I'd like to know when to release Hadoop 2.4.1.
> It looks like all of the blockers have been resolved.
>
> Thanks,
> Akira
>
>
> (2014/04/24 5:59), Arun C Murthy w
Based on the discussion at common-dev@, we've decided to target 2.3
off the tip of branch-2 based on the 2 major HDFS features which are
Heterogenous Storage (HDFS-2832) and HDFS Cache (HDFS-4949).
I'll create a new branch-2.3 on (1/24) at 6pm PST.
thanks,
Arun
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE:
That makes sense too.
On Aug 16, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
wrote:
>
> We need to make a call on what blockers will be. From my limited
> understanding, this doesn't seem like a API or a compatibility issue. Can we
> not fix it in subsequent bug-fix releases?
>
> I do see a lo
Ok, I'll spin rc1 after. Thanks.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 10, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Siddharth Seth wrote:
> Arun, MAPREDUCE-5094 would be a useful jira to include in the 2.0.4-alpha
> release. It's not an absolute blocker since the values can be controlled
> explicitly by changing tests which us
Awesome! +1!
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 2, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote:
> Namenode HA (HDFS-1623) feature is now in trunk (yay!). It adds support for
> namenode high availability with active and standby namenodes, with manual
> failover. I propose merging this feature to 0.23 branch
could be compile or binary or tar.
Arun
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 31, 2011, at 9:05 PM, Aastha Mehta wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to run fuse_dfs_wrapper.sh from
> hadoop-0.20.2/src/contrib/fuse_dfs/src on a 64-bit machine. I get the
> following error:
> ./fuse_dfs: error while loading sh
22 matches
Mail list logo
