+1
Arun
On May 8, 2015, at 10:41 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
>
> May we declare this branch dead and just close bugs (but not
> necessarily concepts, ideas, etc) with won’t fix? I don’t think anyone has
> any intention of working on the 1.3 release, especially given that 1.2.1 w
gt;> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
>> to
>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
With 24 +1s (10 binding) and no -1s the vote passes.
Thanks for everyone who tried the release and provided feedback.
I'll push the bits and send out a note.
thanks,
Arun
On Nov 13, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've created another release candida
rge it into
>>>> 2.6?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> - Tsuyoshi
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Hitesh Shah wrote:
>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> Built Hadoop from source, compiled T
Folks,
I've created another release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.6.0 based on the
feedback.
The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.6.0-rc1
The RC tag in git is: release-2.6.0-rc1
The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
https://repository.apac
onfident I was building against. For anyone who wants those native libs
>> they will be up on
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-slider/tree/develop/bin/windows/ once
>> it syncs with the ASF repos.
>>
>> afterwords: the tests worked!
>>
>>
>> On 11 November
Folks,
I've created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.6.0 that I would like to
see released.
The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.6.0-rc0
The RC tag in git is: release-2.6.0-rc0
The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
https://repositor
… has been a constant pain w.r.t compatibility etc.
Should we consider adopting a policy to not use guava in Common/HDFS/YARN?
MR doesn't matter too much since it's application-side issue, it does hurt
end-users though since they still might want a newer guava-version, but at
least they can mo
Looks like most of the big ones are in. I'll try prod people into finishing up
the rest and get an RC going this week.
Thanks everyone!
Arun
On Oct 14, 2014, at 11:25 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> 2.6.0 is close now.
>
> Here are the remaining blockers, I'm hoping cut an RC
2.6.0 is close now.
Here are the remaining blockers, I'm hoping cut an RC in the next week or so:
http://s.apache.org/hadoop-2.6.0-blockers
thanks,
Arun
On Sep 30, 2014, at 10:42 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've created branch-2.6 to stabilize the release
Re-sending… doesn't look like it made through.
On Sep 30, 2014, at 10:42 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've created branch-2.6 to stabilize the release.
>
> Committers, please exercise caution henceforth on commits other than the
> ones we've
Folks,
With hadoop-2.5 nearly done, it's time to start thinking ahead to hadoop-2.6.
Currently, here is the Roadmap per the wiki:
• HADOOP
• Credential provider HADOOP-10607
• HDFS
• Heterogeneous storage (Phase 2) - Support APIs for using
stor
+1 (binding)
Verified sigs and ran sample jobs. Thanks for taking the lead on this Karthik.
Arun
On Aug 6, 2014, at 1:59 PM, Karthik Kambatla wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have put together a release candidate (rc2) for Hadoop 2.5.0.
>
> The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~kasha/had
With 12 +1s (4 binding), 1 -0 and no -1s the vote passes. I'll push the bits
out shortly.
Thanks to everyone who voted.
thanks,
Arun
On Jun 20, 2014, at 11:51 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've created another release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.4.1 based on the
With 26 +1s (19 binding) and no -1s the vote passes. Thanks to everyone who
voted.
I'm sure every RM who needs to spin rc1+ hence will appreciate this! *smile*
thanks,
Arun
On Jun 24, 2014, at 1:53 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> As discussed, I'd like to call a v
Best,
> Aaron
>
> --
> Aaron T. Myers
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>
>
>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I've created another release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.4.1 based on the
>> feed
Thanks everyone for the discussion. Looks like we have come to a pragmatic and
progressive conclusion.
In terms of execution of the consensus plan, I think a little bit of caution is
in order.
Let's give downstream projects more of a runway.
I propose we inform HBase, Pig, Hive etc. that we ar
On Jun 24, 2014, at 4:22 PM, Andrew Wang wrote:
> Since Hadoop apps can and do depend on the Hadoop classpath, the classpath
> is effectively part of our API. I'm sure there are user apps out there that
> will break if we make incompatible changes to the classpath. I haven't read
> up on the MR
encies can change.
Furthermore, we have *already* changed our classpath in hadoop-2.x. Again, as I
pointed out in the previous thread, here is the precedent:
On Jun 21, 2014, at 5:59 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Also, this is something we already have done i.e. we updated some of our
> softw
Folks,
As discussed, I'd like to call a vote on changing our by-laws to change
release votes from 7 days to 5.
I've attached the change to by-laws I'm proposing.
Please vote, the vote will the usual period of 7 days.
thanks,
Arun
[main]$ svn diff
Index: author/src/documentation/conte
2.5. If I run into any HDFS doubts, I might
> need some help from someone more familiar with HDFS.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I'd appreciate some help here. Due to family reasons (all good ones),
>>
I don't want to block hadoop-2.5 due to
my non-availability.
thanks,
Arun
On Jun 9, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> As you can see from the Roadmap wiki, it looks like several items are still a
> bit away from being ready.
>
> I think rather than wait
After further consideration, here is an alternate.
On Jun 21, 2014, at 11:14 AM, "Arun C. Murthy" wrote:
>
> JDK6 eol was Feb 2013 and, a year later, we are still have customers using it
> - which means we can't drop it yet.
>
> http://www.oracle.com/te
orts.
>
> Let's try to keep this thread focused on the planning side of things
> though, deferring JDK-feature-related discussion to a different thread.
> We'd need to draw up a code-style doc on the wiki, but it sounds like
> something Steve and/or I could dr
test on weekend time(due to the weekday
> schedules), that will give chance to them.
>
> Regards,
> Uma
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Arun C Murthy [mailto:a...@hortonworks.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2014 11:25 AM
> To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org; comm
1-rc1
The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org.
Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 days.
thanks,
Arun
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/hdp/
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use o
e-0.23.11-rc0/
>
> The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org.
>
> Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 days
> til June 26th.
>
> I am +1 (binding).
>
> thanks,
> Tom Graves
>
>
>
>
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonwork
Folks,
I'd like to propose we change our by-laws to reduce our voting periods on new
releases from 7 days to 5.
Currently, it just takes too long to turn around releases; particularly if we
have critical security fixes etc.
Thoughts?
thanks,
Arun
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This m
On Jun 20, 2014, at 9:51 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> On 20 June 2014 21:35, Steve Loughran wrote:
>
>>
>> This actually argues in favour of
>>
>> -renaming branch-2 branch-3 after a release
>> -making trunk hadoop-4
>>
>> -getting hadoop 3 released off the new branch-3 out in 2014, effectiv
ssemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.
tch there yet, it doesn't really help much other than
>>> letting older clients compile - even if we put the API back in, the URL
>>> returned is invalid.
>>>
>>> +Vinod
>>>
>>> On Jun 16, 2014, at 9:27 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>>
The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org.
Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 days.
thanks,
Arun
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/hdp/
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the indiv
e:
>
>
>
> We should also include extended attributes feature for HDFS from HDFS-2006
> for release 2.5.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> As you can see from the Roadmap wiki, it looks like several ite
Folks,
As you can see from the Roadmap wiki, it looks like several items are still a
bit away from being ready.
I think rather than wait for them, it will be useful to create an intermediate
release (2.5) this month - I think ATS security is pretty close, so we can ship
that. I'm thinking of
Folks,
Here is a handy short-cut to track 2.4.1:
http://s.apache.org/hadoop-2.4.1-blockers
I'm hoping we can get the majority of this in by end-of-week and have an RC
for consideration.
Committers - I appreciate if you could try treat review/commit of these as
high-priority. Also, please
Sandy,
On Apr 12, 2014, at 10:09 AM, Sandy Ryza wrote:
> I'm having trouble editing the wiki, but I think Timeline Server stability
> (e.g. security and locking down APIs) should go on that list.
I'm very glad to see you are very passionate about security for ATS since
you've asked about it
h
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> The proposed content for 2.5 in the roadmap wiki looks good to me.
>>> On Apr 12, 2014 7:26 AM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote:
>>>
>>> Gang,
>>>
>>> With hadoop-2.4 out, it's time to think ahead
Summit. If that makes
sense; I think we should target branching for 2.5 by mid-May to get it stable
and released by early June.
Thoughts?
thanks,
Arun
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of
With 11 +1s (4 binding) and no -1s the vote passes. Thanks to everyone who
tried out the release and passed their feedback along.
I'll send a note out once I actually get the bits out and the site updated etc.
thanks,
Arun
On Mar 31, 2014, at 2:22 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
&
le of weeks; I'll make sure to
include as much as your list as possible - and future ones.
thanks,
Arun
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gera
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Azuryy wrote:
>
>> Arun,
>>
>> Do you mean you will cut another RC for
t;
>> https://gist.github.com/oza/9965197
>>
>> Should we fix or disable the feature?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> - Tsuyoshi
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I've created a rel
facts are available via repository.apache.org.
Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 days.
thanks,
Arun
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
Update: We are now down to just 8 blockers of which 4 are already PA.
I know it's getting in good shape per our QE gang too. If things go well, I
plan to create an RC later half of next week.
thanks,
Arun
On Mar 11, 2014, at 7:11 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Sorry, the previous link h
Sorry, the previous link had a bug, the correct one is:
http://s.apache.org/hadoop-2.4.0-blockers.
We are currently down to 12 blockers; with several PA.
thanks,
Arun
On Mar 6, 2014, at 1:40 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Gang,
>
> Most of the big-ticket items are already in
mark it a blocker.
I'll try nudging people to start closing these soon, appreciate any help!
thanks,
Arun
On Feb 20, 2014, at 3:45 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Thanks Azuryy & Suresh. I've updated the roadmap wiki to reflect this.
>
> Arun
>
> On Feb 20, 2014,
With 22 +1s (7 binding) and no -1s the vote passes.
Thanks to all who tried and verified the release, I'll start the process to
push the bits out.
Arun
On Feb 11, 2014, at 6:49 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.3.0 t
ting is in progress)
>
> So HDFS features should be ready in two weeks.
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Azuryy wrote:
>
>> Hi，
>> I think you omit some key pieces in 2.4
>>
>> Protobuf fsimage, rolling upgrade are also targeting 2.4
>&
On Feb 17, 2014, at 9:44 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Committers, please exercise caution to ensure we only commit necessary
> bug-fixes henceforth.
Forgot to add…
Committers: I've created version "2.5.0" in jira with the expectation that most
things will now commit to
Other than Azuryy I haven't heard from HDFS folks. To help move this discussion
along, I've created branch-2.4. Let's continue discussions here.
Committers, please exercise caution to ensure we only commit necessary
bug-fixes henceforth.
thanks,
Arun
On Feb 15, 2014, at 2:59 PM
Other than Azuryy I haven't heard from HDFS folks. To help move this discussion
along, I've created branch-2.4. Let's continue discussions here.
Committers, please exercise caution to ensure we only commit necessary
bug-fixes henceforth.
thanks,
Arun
On Feb 15, 2014, at 2:59 PM
e 2.4 in mid-March.
I've updated https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Roadmap to reflect this.
Also, we should start thinking ahead to 2.5 and what folks would like to see
in it. If we continue our 6-week cycles, we could shoot to get that out in
April.
Thoughts?
thanks,
Arun
--
Arun C. Murth
Folks,
I've created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.3.0 that I would like to
get released.
The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.3.0-rc0
The RC tag in svn is here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.3.0-rc0
The maven artifacts are
t;>
>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Robert Kanter <
>&g
rall, I'll try get this out in next couple of days if we can clear the list.
thanks,
Arun
On Feb 3, 2014, at 12:14 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> An update. Per https://s.apache.org/hadoop-2.3.0-blockers we are now down to
> 5 blockers: 1 Common, 1 HDFS, 3 YARN.
>
> Daryn (thanks!)
An update. Per https://s.apache.org/hadoop-2.3.0-blockers we are now down to 5
blockers: 1 Common, 1 HDFS, 3 YARN.
Daryn (thanks!) has both the non-YARN covered. Vinod is helping out with the
YARN ones.
thanks,
Arun
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of
for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copyi
t
org.cloudera.htrace.TraceTree;
hbase-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/trace/TestHTraceHooks.java:import
org.cloudera.htrace.impl.POJOSpanReceiver;
hbase-shell/src/main/ruby/shell/commands/trace.rb:java_import
org.cloudera.htrace.Sampler
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hor
Mostly ready for a jira perspective.
Committers - Henceforth, please use extreme caution while committing to
branch-2.3. Please commit *only* blockers to 2.3.
thanks,
Arun
On Jan 28, 2014, at 3:30 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Fixing up stuff now, thanks to Andrew for volunteering to help w
Fixing up stuff now, thanks to Andrew for volunteering to help with Common/HDFS.
Arun
On Jan 28, 2014, at 10:54 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Sorry, missed this. Go ahead, I'll fix things up at the back end. Thanks.
>
> On Jan 28, 2014, at 12:11 AM, Sandy Ryza wrote:
>
>
We should hold off commits until that's done, right?
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>>
>>> Yep, on it as we speak. :)
>>>
>>>
>>> Arun
>>>
>>> On Jan 27, 2014, at 12:36 PM, Jason Low
7;re not fixed until 2.4.0.
>
> Jason
>
> On 01/27/2014 08:47 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>> Done. I've re-created branch-2.3 from branch-2.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Arun
>>
>> On Jan 23, 2014, at 2:40 AM, Arun Murthy wrote:
>>
>>> Base
HDFS-2832) and HDFS Cache (HDFS-4949).
>
> I'll create a new branch-2.3 on (1/24) at 6pm PST.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> next releases without additional effort.
>
> I would like to see HDFS caching make it into 2.4. The APIs and
> implementation are beginning to stabilize, and around January it
> should be ok to backport to a stable branch.
>
> best,
> Colin
>
>
> On Thu, N
Ok, I've updated https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Roadmap with a initial strawman
list for hadoop-2.4 which I feel we can get out in Jan.
What else would folks like to see? Please keep timeframe in mind.
thanks,
Arun
On Dec 2, 2013, at 10:55 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
> On Nov 13,
lease-0.23.10-rc0/
>
>
> The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org.
>
>
> Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 days
> til December 9th.
>
> I am +1 (binding).
>
> thanks,
> Tom Graves
>
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonwo
On Nov 13, 2013, at 1:55 PM, Jason Lowe wrote:
>
>
> +1 to limiting checkins of patch releases to Blockers/Criticals. If
> necessary committers check into trunk/branch-2 only and defer to the patch
> release manager for the patch release merge. Then there should be fewer
> surprises for ev
On Dec 2, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Ok, looks like there are no objections.
>
> I'm starting the work to rename 2.2.1 to 2.3 now. Committers, please hold
> commits till I send out the all clear.
Done. I've renamed 2.3 -> 2.4 and 2.2.1 -> 2.3.
I&#x
Ok, looks like there are no objections.
I'm starting the work to rename 2.2.1 to 2.3 now. Committers, please hold
commits till I send out the all clear.
thanks,
Arun
On Nov 20, 2013, at 6:38 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Jason,
>
> I'm glad to see we are converging. I&#x
e features in it
> and tons of code churn, but I think many were treating it as the next vehicle
> to deliver changes in general. If we think 2.2.1 is just as good or better
> than 2.2.0 then let's wrap it up and move to a more disciplined approach for
> subsequent patch re
eek window a feature goes to the next train.
Makes sense?
thanks,
Arun
>
> -Sandy
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 12, 2013, at 1:54 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Colin McC
On Nov 12, 2013, at 1:54 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Colin McCabe wrote:
>
>> To be honest, I'm not aware of anything in 2.2.1 that shouldn't be
>> there. However, I have only been following the HDFS and common side
>> of things so I may not have the full picture.
On Nov 12, 2013, at 1:54 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Colin McCabe wrote:
>
>> To be honest, I'm not aware of anything in 2.2.1 that shouldn't be
>> there. However, I have only been following the HDFS and common side
>> of things so I may not have the full picture.
(e.g. security) via YARN-896
* RM Fail-over via ZKFC
* Anything else?
HDFS???
Overall, I feel like we have a decent chance of rolling hadoop-2.3 by the end
of the year.
Thoughts?
thanks,
Arun
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE:
On Oct 18, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> Currently http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable/ points to hadoop-1. With
>> hadoop-2 going GA, should we just point that to hadoop-2?
>&
le2 -> hadoop-2.x
# Just point stable to hadoop-2 and create something new for hadoop-1:
http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/hadoop1 -> hadoop-1.x
http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable -> hadoop-2.x
We have similar requirements for *current* link too.
Thoughts?
thanks,
Arun
--
Arun C. Murthy
With 31 +1s (15 binding) and no -1s the vote passes.
Congratulations to all, Hadoop 2 is now GA!
thanks,
Arun
On Oct 7, 2013, at 12:00 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.2.0 that I would like to
> get released - thi
Colin, Andrew, Daryn, Chris and others for helping nail down
the symlinks-related issues. I'll release note the fact that we have disabled
it in 2.2. Also, thanks to Vinod for some heavy-lifting on the YARN side in the
last couple of weeks.
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://horto
Looks like we are all clear now, I'll create an RC presently.
Thanks everyone.
Arun
On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:59 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Yes, sorry if it wasn't clear.
>
> As others seem to agree, I think we'll be better getting a protocol/api
> stable GA done and
at you want to skip a beta release and go straight to GA
> with the next release?
>
> thx
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
>> Guys,
>>
>> I took a look at the content in 2.1.2-beta so far, other than the
>> critical
content already...
Thoughts?
thanks,
Arun
On Sep 24, 2013, at 4:24 PM, Zhijie Shen wrote:
> I've added MAPREDUCE-5531 to the blocker list. - Zhijie
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
>> With 4 +1s (3 binding) and no -1s the vote passes. I
Shen wrote:
>
>> I've added MAPREDUCE-5531 to the blocker list. - Zhijie
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Arun C Murthy
>> wrote:
>>
>>> With 4 +1s (3 binding) and no -1s the vote passes. I'll push it out… I'll
>>> m
Target Version 2.1.2-beta).
The current blockers are here: http://s.apache.org/hadoop-2.1.2-beta-blockers
thanks,
Arun
On Sep 16, 2013, at 11:38 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.1.1-beta that I would
> like to get
se pre-GA.
>
> I'd also like to add HADOOP-9761 to tucu's list of JIRAs, a symlink+viewfs
> regression that's mistakenly only in branch-2.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
>> Rather than spin a
t;>
>> # Started HDFS cluster, verified the hdfs CLI commands such ls, copying
>> data back and forth, verified namenode webUI etc.
>>
>> # Ran some tests such as sleep job, TestDFSIO, NNBench etc.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:38 P
, and tooling like the FsShell and Distcp still need to be
> updated as well.
>
> So, there's definitely work to be done, but there are a lot of users
> interested in the feature, and symlinks really should be in GA. Would
> appreciate any thoughts/input on the matter.
>
>
l run for the usual 7 days.
thanks,
Arun
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Arun C Murthy resolved HDFS-4952.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Duplicate of HDFS-3983
> dfs -ls hftp:// fails on sec
I'm planning on creating a branch-2.1.1-beta by EOD today. Ok?
thanks,
Arun
On Aug 16, 2013, at 7:39 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Gang,
>
> I spent time looking through changes slated for hadoop-2.1.1-beta and things
> look fairly contained (~10 or so changes for each of C
With 9 +1s including mine (6 binding) and no -1s, the vote passes. Thanks to
all who voted.
Arun
On Aug 15, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've created a release candidate (rc2) for hadoop-2.1.0-beta that I would
> like to get released - this fixe
> The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org.
>
> The only difference between rc0 and rc1 is ASL added to releasenotes.html and
> updated release dates in CHANGES.txt files.
>
> Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 days.
&g
ut, I'll withhold my vote. If RC2 ends up getting
> released as-is, we should be sure to change the fix version field on that
> JIRA to be correct.
>
> --
> Aaron T. Myers
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
FYI - here is the end-point I'm using to track blockers on 2.1.1-beta:
http://s.apache.org/hadoop-2.1.1-beta-blockers
Essentially, these are *Blocker* bugs with *Target Version* set to 2.1.1-beta.
thanks,
Arun
On Aug 16, 2013, at 7:39 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Gang,
>
>
ster'
for the final hadoop-2 GA release. I don't mean to jinx it but saying it out
loud, but I feel we could look at pushing out hadoop-2 GA by mid-September…
there I said it! *smile*
Thoughts?
thanks,
Arun
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
--
CONFIDENTIA
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 16, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> We need to make a call on what blockers will be. From my limited
>>>> understanding, this doesn't seem like
_________
> From: Arun C Murthy
> To: "common-...@hadoop.apache.org" ;
> "hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org" ;
> "mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org" ;
> "yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org"
> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 4:15 PM
>
e.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.1.0-beta-rc2
The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org.
Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 days.
thanks,
Arun
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
N
9816. I think I understand the problem and it shouldn't be hard to
> fix.
>
> The bug went unnoticed because sadly there are no unit tests for the QOP
> options, even though it just involves a conf setting.
>
> Daryn
>
>
> On Jul 29, 2013, at 5:00 PM, Arun C Mur
he RC tag in svn is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.1.0-beta-rc1
The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org.
Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 days.
thanks,
Arun
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
gt;>>
>>>> It is a consequence of YARN-701 and depends on it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> YARN-918 is an API change. And YARN-701 is a behaviour change. We need
>>> both in 2.1.0.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> * YARN-926
>>>>
>>>> It would be nice to have it addressed before GA release.
>>>
>>>
>>> Either ways. I'd get it in sooner than later specifically when we are
>>> trying to replace the old API with the new one.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> +Vino
>>>
>>>
>>
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
rious or not.
>
> This is the last bit that blocks the Bigtop side of things as far as
> 2.1 is concerned.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> I've created a release candidate (rc0) for had
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
