+1 (binding)
Thanks to the Ozone folks for their efforts at maintaining good separation
with HDFS and common. I took a lot of heat for the unpopular opinion that
they should be separate, so I am glad the process has worked out well for
both codebases. It looks like my concerns were addressed and
Hi Wei-Chiu,
Can you share the calendar link again for this meeting?
Thanks,
Aaron
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 9:31 AM Matt Foley wrote:
> Sorry I won’t be able to come today; a work meeting interferes.
> —Matt
>
> On Sep 4, 2019, at 9:10 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote:
>
> It's a short week so I didn'
Thank you Wei-Chiu for organizing this and sending out notes!
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 1:10 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote:
> We had a great turnout today, thanks to Konstantin for leading the
> discussion of the NameNode Fine-Grained Locking proposal.
>
> There were at least 16 participants joined the
> Da
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 5:14 PM Ajay Kumar > > .invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Congrats Aaron!!
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 4:00 PM Daniel Templeton
&g
+1 to unprotect feature branch (in general) for rebasing against trunk.
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 7:53 PM Dinesh Chitlangia
wrote:
> +1(non-binding) for branch.
>
> -Dinesh
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 10:04 PM Brahma Reddy Battula
> wrote:
>
> > Yes Arpit,it’s not for trunk..
> >
> >
> > On
+1 assuming we get the technical issues sorted. I'll give your patch a go
today.
As Steve mentioned on the JIRA, unsupported JVM is called out as an
exception in the compatibility guidelines:
"The JVM requirements will not change across point releases within the same
minor release except if the J
+1. I think formatted patches and PRs will be an improvement. I've used
the git --committer thing a couple of times here without issue.
Another unrelated improvement with github is handling of large changes. I
really think large patches should be split up into logical subcommitts and
PR's support
Thanks Sunil and everyone who has worked on this release.
+1 from me.
- Verified checksums for tar file.
- Built from tar.gz.
- Ran through S3A and S3Guard integration tests (in AWS us-west 2).
This includes a yarn minicluster test but is mostly focused on s3a/s3guard.
Cheers,
Aaron
On Thu, J
achieve the faster release
> cadence
> >>>>>> also.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - Sunil
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 7:21 PM Steve Loughran
wrote:
>
>
> On 16 Jul 2018, at 23:45, Sunil G sun...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
> I would also would like to take this opportunity to come up with a detailed
> plan.
>
> - Feature freeze date : all features should be merged by August 10, 2018.
>
>
>
>
+1
Built from source. Ran S3A integration tests in us-west-2 with S3Guard
(both Local and Dynamo metadatastore).
Everything worked fine except I hit one integration test failure. It is a
minor test issue IMO and I've filed HADOOP-14927
Failed tests:
ITestS3GuardToolDynamoDB>AbstractS3GuardToo
Thanks for the hard work on this! +1 (non-binding)
- Built from source tarball on OS X w/ Java 1.8.0_45.
- Deployed mini/pseudo cluster.
- Ran grep and wordcount examples.
- Poked around ResourceManager and JobHistory UIs.
- Ran all s3a integration tests in US West 2.
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 10:
Aaron Fabbri created HDFS-10890:
---
Summary: Math error in AbstractContractDistCpTest
Key: HDFS-10890
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10890
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Bug
+1, non-binding.
I built everything on OS X and ran the s3a contract tests successfully:
mvn test -Dtest=org.apache.hadoop.fs.contract.s3a.\*
...
Results :
Tests run: 78, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 1
[INFO]
[INF
14 matches
Mail list logo
