Thanks, everyone, for starting this discussion. This sounds like a good
plan to start with. As I was working on the JUnit 4 to 5 upgrade, I paused
for a while as I got occupied with other stuff. But I would be happy to
complete it as part of the Java switch process.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 4:21 AM
For more details, see
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java11-linux-x86_64/714/
No changes
-1 overall
The following subsystems voted -1:
blanks hadolint mvnsite pathlen spotbugs unit xml
The following subsystems voted -1 but
were configured to be filtered/ignored:
Thank you very much for initiating this discussion! I am also very much
looking forward to JDK 17. I have observed that using --add-opens= is quite
common in other Apache projects. One thing I know is that it is necessary
to upgrade JUnit 4 to JUnit 5. There are some JIRA issues currently being
wor
For more details, see
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86_64/1653/
No changes
-1 overall
The following subsystems voted -1:
blanks hadolint pathlen spotbugs unit xml
The following subsystems voted -1 but
were configured to be filtered/ignored:
cc chec
Depends on what we mean by switching to JDK-17, Compile time support
or Runtime support, We don't have compile time support for JDK-11 too,
it is just runtime, We have a daily build as well for JDK-11, which
has now some genuine failures now, need to check [1], as of now the
version is hardcoded he
I think this is worth considering. I think it would require a minor
release like 3.5.0 as opposed to considering it for future 3.4.x patch
releases.
I tend to build locally with Java 11, by default and I haven't hit
major issues building Hadoop. There may be some gotcha somewhere but
it is likely t
A lot of projects are moving off java8. making java17 the new baseline
what do we need to there that is blocker rather than just "nice"'?
For more details, see
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1468/
No changes
-1 overall
The following subsystems voted -1:
asflicense hadolint mvnsite pathlen unit
The following subsystems voted -1 but
were configured to be filtered/ignored:
cc
