Thanx for the details, sounds cool, good luck with the feature!!!
-Ayush
> On 29 May 2024, at 8:56 AM, zhangjian <1361320...@qq.com> wrote:
>
> Thank you for taking the time to review this proposal.
> Your opinion does point out the key issues to designing an asynchronous
> router, but my prop
Thank you for taking the time to review this proposal.
Your opinion does point out the key issues to designing an asynchronous router,
but my proposal can address these issues:
1. My design does not affect the functionality of existing synchronous routers
in throwing stanby or retry exceptions an
Thanx folks, I had a very quick pass on the PDF and it looks good.
Maybe some doubts around the fact where it was mentioned that if a
Namenode returns a StandbyException or something on similar lines, the
Router will retry, I think we have some logic in RouterRpcClient
checking for such case, if i
For more details, see
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86_64/1593/
No changes
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-h...@hadoop.a
Sounds good. Thanks for sharing your findings.
On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 2:24 AM zhangjian <1361320...@qq.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone, I conducted a performance comparison test between sync and
> asynchronous router, and the test results showed that in single ns or multi
> ns scenarios, Asynchrono
For more details, see
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1406/
No changes
-1 overall
The following subsystems voted -1:
asflicense hadolint mvnsite pathlen unit
The following subsystems voted -1 but
were configured to be filtered/ignored:
cc
Hi, any more feedback for this proposal?
> 下面是被转发的邮件：
>
> 发件人: zhangjian <1361320...@qq.com>
> 主题: 回复：[Discuss] RBF: Aynchronous router RPC.
> 日期: 2024年5月25日 GMT+8 17:23:31
> 收件人: Yuanbo Liu
> 抄送: Xiaoqiao He , Ayush Saxena ,
> inigo...@apache.org, Sangjin Lee , Simbarashe Dzinamarira
> , comm
