[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hui Fei resolved HDFS-17405.
Resolution: Fixed
> [FGL] Using different metric name to trace FGL and Global lock
> --
I've heard zgc is better in jdk17 or above, so I think the major problem is
that we have to upgrade hadoop code to fit in jdk17.
We were using jdk11 with zgc to test NN, and didn't see an impressive
improvement.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 11:53 AM Takanobu Asanuma
wrote:
> > We're trying tuning gc o
+1 Option2
I also agree with the idea of upgrading hbase 2.2 to 2.5.
Shilun Fan.
> Hbase v1 is EOL for a while now, so option 2 probably makes sense. While
> you are at it you should probably update the hbase2 version, because 2.2.x
> is also very old and EOL. 2.5.x is the currently maintained r
> We're trying tuning gc options and even new gc engine like zgc, but they
are not very helpful.
I'm afraid this is a digression, but could you elaborate on using ZGC for
NameNode? Did you encounter any problems?
I've never heard of using ZGC for NameNode in practice, so I'm curious
about it.
Reg
> a. Snapshot, Symbolic link and reserved feature are not mentioned at the
design doc, should it be considered
Yes, I agree. Since the snapshot、symbol link is not popular in HADOOP, we
can try to use global lock(write lock of root inode?). In our production
env, we just ignore those features, but i
Thanks for suggestions.
Actually Started working on this improvement. And cut the development
branch :)
>From the proposal doc and the current reviewing work, seems that it doesn't
touch the existing logic codes too much. It keeps the original logic there.
@Yuanbo @Zengqiang XU Could you share
For more details, see
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1323/
No changes
-1 overall
The following subsystems voted -1:
asflicense hadolint mvnsite pathlen unit
The following subsystems voted -1 but
were configured to be filtered/ignored:
cc
For more details, see
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java11-linux-x86_64/640/
No changes
-1 overall
The following subsystems voted -1:
blanks hadolint mvnsite pathlen spotbugs unit xml
The following subsystems voted -1 but
were configured to be filtered/ignored:
For more details, see
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86_64/1519/
No changes
-1 overall
The following subsystems voted -1:
blanks hadolint pathlen spotbugs unit xml
The following subsystems voted -1 but
were configured to be filtered/ignored:
cc chec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Trezzo resolved HDFS-17404.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Add Namenode info to log message when setting block keys from active nn
> ---
Rushabh Shah created HDFS-17409:
---
Summary: TestDFSAdmin has couple of flaky tests.
Key: HDFS-17409
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17409
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hui Fei reopened HDFS-17384:
> [FGL] Replace the global lock with global FS Lock and global BM lock
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hui Fei resolved HDFS-17384.
Resolution: Fixed
> [FGL] Replace the global lock with global FS Lock and global BM lock
>
Hbase v1 is EOL for a while now, so option 2 probably makes sense. While
you are at it you should probably update the hbase2 version, because 2.2.x
is also very old and EOL. 2.5.x is the currently maintained release for
hbase2, with 2.5.7 being the latest. We’re soon going to release 2.6.0 as
well.
Hi Folks,
As of now we have two profiles for HBase: one for HBase v1(1.7.1) & other
for v2(2.2.4). The versions are specified over here: [1], how to build is
mentioned over here: [2]
As of now we by default run our Jenkins "only" for HBase v1, so we have
seen HBase v2 profile silently breaking a c
Hi,
We have a PR [1] which is gonna fix those tests related to those java
ByteBuffer, I will follow up on that & get it merged.
-Ayush
[1] https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6593
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 12:59, 王磊 wrote:
> Hi, I found some tests always fails in some pull requests such as
> had
16 matches
Mail list logo
