[jira] [Created] (HDFS-16039) RBF: Some indicators of RBFMetrics count inaccurately

Xiangyi Zhu created HDFS-16039: -- Summary: RBF: Some indicators of RBFMetrics count inaccurately Key: HDFS-16039 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16039 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-16038) DataNode Unrecognized Observer Node when cluster add an observer node

lei w created HDFS-16038: Summary: DataNode Unrecognized Observer Node when cluster add an observer node Key: HDFS-16038 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16038 Project: Hadoop HDFS Is

Re: [E] Re: [DISCUSS] Change project style guidelines to allow line length 100

In apache tez, formal line length is 120 characters. So, I recommend 120+ On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 4:46 PM Kihwal Lee wrote: > +1 for the 100 char limit. > But I would have liked 132 columns more. :) > > Kihwal > > On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 1:46 PM Sean Busbey > wrote: > > > Hi folks! > > > > The

Re: [E] Re: [DISCUSS] Change project style guidelines to allow line length 100

+1 for the 100 char limit. But I would have liked 132 columns more. :) Kihwal On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 1:46 PM Sean Busbey wrote: > Hi folks! > > The consensus seems pretty strongly in favor of increasing the line length > limit. Do folks still want to see a formal VOTE thread? > > > > On May 1

Apache Hadoop qbt Report: trunk+JDK8 on Linux/x86_64

For more details, see https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86_64/517/ No changes -1 overall The following subsystems voted -1: blanks pathlen unit xml The following subsystems voted -1 but were configured to be filtered/ignored: cc checkstyle javac javado

Re: [DISCUSS] Change project style guidelines to allow line length 100

Hi folks! The consensus seems pretty strongly in favor of increasing the line length limit. Do folks still want to see a formal VOTE thread? > On May 19, 2021, at 4:22 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > > Hello! > > What do folks think about changing our line length guidelines to allow for > 100 cha

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-16037) Possible Resource Leak in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.tools.offlineImageViewer#FSImageLoader

Narges Shadab created HDFS-16037: Summary: Possible Resource Leak in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.tools.offlineImageViewer#FSImageLoader Key: HDFS-16037 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16037

Re: [DISCUSS] which release lines should we still consider actively maintained?

+1, to mark 3.1.x EOL. Apache Hive does depends on 3.1.0 as of now, but due to guave upgrade on branch-3.1, the attempt to migrate to latest 3.1.x didn’t work for me atleast couple of months back. So, mostly 3.3.1 would be the only option replacing 3.1.0 there or at worst 3.3.2 in a couple of mo

Re: [DISCUSS] which release lines should we still consider actively maintained?

+1 to EOL 3.1.x at least. > On May 23, 2021, at 9:51 PM, Wei-Chiu Chuang > wrote: > > Sean, > > For reasons I don't understand, I never received emails from your new > address in the mailing list. Only Akira's response. > > I was just able to start a thread like this. > > I am +1 to EOL 3.1

[VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.3.1 - RC1

Hi community, This is the release candidate RC1 of Apache Hadoop 3.3.1 line. All blocker issues have been resolved. It contains 697 fixed jira issues [2] since 3.3.0 which include a lot of features and improvements(read the full set of release notes). Below feature additions are the highlights o

[jira] [Resolved] (HDFS-15790) Make ProtobufRpcEngineProtos and ProtobufRpcEngineProtos2 Co-Exist

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wei-Chiu Chuang resolved HDFS-15790. Fix Version/s: 3.4.0 3.3.1 Resolution: Fixed > Make ProtobufRpcEn

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-16035) Remove DummyGroupMapping

Viraj Jasani created HDFS-16035: --- Summary: Remove DummyGroupMapping Key: HDFS-16035 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16035 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: Task Repor