+1
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 6:23 PM Takanobu Asanuma
wrote:
> +1 for 100 characters. Thanks.
>
> 2021年5月21日(金) 8:38 Chao Sun :
>
> > +1. I think this will be very helpful.
> >
> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 3:10 PM Sangjin Lee wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding). It's long overdue IMHO.
> > >
> > > On Th
Hi community,
This is the preview bits of the first release candidate of Apache
Hadoop 3.3.1 line. It takes tremendous amount of effort to produce a Hadoop
RC
and we still have a number of unresolved issues [1]. Meanwhile, I'd like to
publish
preview bits so you guys can check out earlier than lat
+1 for 100 characters. Thanks.
2021年5月21日(金) 8:38 Chao Sun :
> +1. I think this will be very helpful.
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 3:10 PM Sangjin Lee wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding). It's long overdue IMHO.
> >
> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:11 PM Gergely Pollak
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I really like this
+1. I think this will be very helpful.
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 3:10 PM Sangjin Lee wrote:
> +1 (binding). It's long overdue IMHO.
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:11 PM Gergely Pollak
> wrote:
>
> > I really like this initiative, thank you!
> > +1 for line length increase to 100 characters.
> >
>
Hi folks!
Which release lines do we as a community still consider actively maintained?
I found an earlier discussion[1] where we had consensus to consider branches
that don’t get maintenance releases on a regular basis end-of-life for
practical purposes. The result of that discussion was writ
+1 (binding). It's long overdue IMHO.
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:11 PM Gergely Pollak
wrote:
> I really like this initiative, thank you!
> +1 for line length increase to 100 characters.
>
> Regards,
> Gergely Pollak
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 8:30 PM Vivek Ratnavel
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-bind
For more details, see
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86_64/513/
[May 19, 2021 3:14:18 AM] (noreply) Bump node-sass (#3004)
[May 19, 2021 5:55:47 AM] (noreply) HADOOP-17426. Upgrade to
hadoop-thirdparty-1.1.0. (#3024)
[May 19, 2021 5:53:42 PM] (noreply) HDFS-15757
+1 (non-binding) to increase line length to 100 characters. This will
definitely help clear most of the checkstyle violations.
Thank you Sean for starting this thread!
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 7:17 AM Sean Busbey
wrote:
> Hi Bhavik!
>
> What concerns do you have about back porting patches to ear
Hi Bhavik!
What concerns do you have about back porting patches to earlier release
branches?
If we change our style guidelines then presumably we can do that for all
branches, so a backport from e.g. trunk to branch-3.3 won’t fail a style check
on the destination branch unless something change
+1 (non-binding) to increasing line length to 100 instead of 80 and
applying this to all active branches (for the ease of backport as Stephen
mentioned).
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 3:30 PM, Stephen O'Donnell
wrote:
> I am +1 on increasing the line length to 100.
>
> As for changes to address existi
I am +1 on increasing the line length to 100.
As for changes to address existing style issues - I think that is more pain
than it's worth. It will make backports much harder, and we have quite a
few active branches, not to mention those who maintain custom builds.
To ease the backport problems th
For more details, see
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/304/
[May 17, 2021 7:37:07 AM] (noreply) HDFS-15912. Allow ProtobufRpcEngine to be
extensible (#2999)
[May 17, 2021 10:47:03 AM] (Akira Ajisaka) YARN-10555. Missing access check
before getAppAttempt
I am just worried about the backporting of the Jira to child branch!! How
we are planning to handle this?
On Thu, May 20, 2021, 11:09 AM Qi Zhu <821684...@qq.com> wrote:
> +1 100 is reasonable.
>
>
>
> ---Original---
> From: "Xiaoqiao He" Date: Thu, May 20, 2021 13:35 PM
> To: "Masatake Iwasaki"
13 matches
Mail list logo
