Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.0.0 RC1

2020-08-27 Thread 617072740
+1 (non-binding) 1.Verified mds 2.Verified signatures 3.Verified the output of `ozone version` (includes the good git revision) 4.Deployed to 3 nodes physical cluster 5.Tried create volume and bucket, write and read key, by Ozone shell and S3Gateway. Sammi Chen https://home.apache

Apache Hadoop qbt Report: branch-2.10+JDK7 on Linux/x86_64

2020-08-27 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
For more details, see https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/39/ [Aug 27, 2020 10:21:20 PM] (noreply) HADOOP-17159. Make UGI support forceful relogin from keytab ignoring the last login time (#2245)

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-15545) (S)Webhdfs will not use updated delegation tokens available in the ugi after the old ones expire

2020-08-27 Thread Issac Buenrostro (Jira)
Issac Buenrostro created HDFS-15545: --- Summary: (S)Webhdfs will not use updated delegation tokens available in the ugi after the old ones expire Key: HDFS-15545 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-155

Re: [DISCUSS] fate of branch-2.9

2020-08-27 Thread Masatake Iwasaki
+1 on EOL of branch-2.9. Since there are a lot of backported fixes in branch-2.10 after 2.10.0 (2019 Oct 29), it would be nice to release 2.10.1. I'm happy to help release work. Masatake Iwasaki On 2020/08/28 3:25, Mingliang Liu wrote: are there any Hadoop branch-2 releases planned, ever? If

[jira] [Resolved] (HDFS-15531) Namenode UI: List snapshots in separate table for each snapshottable directory

2020-08-27 Thread Vivek Ratnavel Subramanian (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vivek Ratnavel Subramanian resolved HDFS-15531. --- Resolution: Fixed > Namenode UI: List snapshots in separate table for

Re: [DISCUSS] fate of branch-2.9

2020-08-27 Thread Mingliang Liu
> are there any Hadoop branch-2 releases planned, ever? If so I'll need to backport my s3a directory compatibility patch to whatever is still live. The branch-2 is gone. I think you mean branch-2.10, Steve. Many HBase users are still using Hadoop 2, so I hope Hadoop 2.10.x should still be release

Apache Hadoop qbt Report: trunk+JDK8 on Linux/x86_64

2020-08-27 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
For more details, see https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86_64/247/ [Aug 26, 2020 7:33:08 AM] (Hemanth Boyina) HDFS-15536. RBF: Clear Quota in Router was not consistent. [Aug 26, 2020 7:38:17 AM] (pjoseph) YARN-1806. Add ThreadDump Option in YARN UI2 to fetch for run

Re: [DISCUSS] fate of branch-2.9

2020-08-27 Thread John Zhuge
+1 On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 6:01 AM Ayush Saxena wrote: > +1 > > -Ayush > > > On 27-Aug-2020, at 6:24 PM, Steve Loughran > wrote: > > > >  > > > > +1 > > > > are there any Hadoop branch-2 releases planned, ever? If so I'll need to > backport my s3a directory compatibility patch to whatever is s

Re: [Virtual MEETUP]: Migration to Hadoop 3

2020-08-27 Thread epa...@apache.org
Wei-Chiu, our plans are tentative at the moment, but we have internally discussed migrating from 2.10 to 3.2. And, thank you all again for the great participation, especially those of you in timezones where it was late in the evening. -Eric On Thursday, August 27, 2020, 12:47:43 AM CDT, Wei-Ch

Re: [DISCUSS] fate of branch-2.9

2020-08-27 Thread Ayush Saxena
+1 -Ayush > On 27-Aug-2020, at 6:24 PM, Steve Loughran > wrote: > >  > > +1 > > are there any Hadoop branch-2 releases planned, ever? If so I'll need to > backport my s3a directory compatibility patch to whatever is still live. > > >> On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 06:55, Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote:

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-15544) Standby namenode EditLogTailerThread shouldn't aquire a lock interruptibly when do tail edits

2020-08-27 Thread snodawn (Jira)
snodawn created HDFS-15544: -- Summary: Standby namenode EditLogTailerThread shouldn't aquire a lock interruptibly when do tail edits Key: HDFS-15544 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15544 Proje

Re: [DISCUSS] fate of branch-2.9

2020-08-27 Thread Steve Loughran
+1 are there any Hadoop branch-2 releases planned, ever? If so I'll need to backport my s3a directory compatibility patch to whatever is still live. On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 06:55, Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote: > Bump up this thread after 6 months. > > Is anyone still interested in the 2.9 release line

Re: [DISCUSS] fate of branch-2.9

2020-08-27 Thread Stephen O'Donnell
+1 for EOL of 2.9. On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 1:17 PM Sunil Govindan wrote: > +1 > > Thanks > Sunil > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 3:49 PM Xiaoqiao He wrote: > > > +1 for putting 2.9 release lines to EOL. > > > > Thanks, > > Hexiaoqiao > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 3:14 PM Mingliang Liu wrote: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] fate of branch-2.9

2020-08-27 Thread Sunil Govindan
+1 Thanks Sunil On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 3:49 PM Xiaoqiao He wrote: > +1 for putting 2.9 release lines to EOL. > > Thanks, > Hexiaoqiao > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 3:14 PM Mingliang Liu wrote: > >> +1 for putting 2.9 lines to EOL. >> >> Let's focus on 2.10 releases for Hadoop 2. Also is there a

Re: [DISCUSS] fate of branch-2.9

2020-08-27 Thread Xiaoqiao He
+1 for putting 2.9 release lines to EOL. Thanks, Hexiaoqiao On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 3:14 PM Mingliang Liu wrote: > +1 for putting 2.9 lines to EOL. > > Let's focus on 2.10 releases for Hadoop 2. Also is there any plan for > 2.10.1? It has been 11 months since 2.10 first release. > > Thanks, > >

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-15543) RBF: Write Should allow, when a subcluster is unavailable for RANDOM mount points with fault Tolerance enabled.

2020-08-27 Thread Harshakiran Reddy (Jira)
Harshakiran Reddy created HDFS-15543: Summary: RBF: Write Should allow, when a subcluster is unavailable for RANDOM mount points with fault Tolerance enabled. Key: HDFS-15543 URL: https://issues.apache.org/ji

[jira] [Resolved] (HDFS-15500) In-order deletion of snapshots: Diff lists must be update only in the last snapshot

2020-08-27 Thread Shashikant Banerjee (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shashikant Banerjee resolved HDFS-15500. Fix Version/s: 3.4.0 Resolution: Fixed Thanks [~szetszwo] for the contributi

Re: [DISCUSS] fate of branch-2.9

2020-08-27 Thread Mingliang Liu
+1 for putting 2.9 lines to EOL. Let's focus on 2.10 releases for Hadoop 2. Also is there any plan for 2.10.1? It has been 11 months since 2.10 first release. Thanks, On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:57 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote: > Bump up this thread after 6 months. > > Is anyone still interested in