Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 RC2

2014-08-10 Thread Yongjun Zhang
+1 (non-binding), pending the document issue Akira found out + downloaded src tarball and did build + deployed two pseudo-distributed clusters + ran some sample mapreduce job on one cluster + ran basic distcp test between the two clusters Thanks. --Yongjun On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Akira

RE: [VOTE] Migration from subversion to git for version control

2014-08-10 Thread Gangumalla, Uma
+1 Regards, Uma -Original Message- From: Karthik Kambatla [mailto:ka...@cloudera.com] Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2014 8:27 AM To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Migration from subversi

Re: [VOTE] Migration from subversion to git for version control

2014-08-10 Thread Devaraj K
+1 (non-binding) On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Karthik Kambatla wrote: > I have put together this proposal based on recent discussion on this topic. > > Please vote on the proposal. The vote runs for 7 days. > >1. Migrate from subversion to git for version control. >2. Force-push to b

Re: [VOTE] Migration from subversion to git for version control

2014-08-10 Thread Akira AJISAKA
+1 (non-binding), I don't use subversion at all in creating patches. After the migration, we need to change test-patch.sh to use git. Thanks, Akira (2014/08/11 7:18), Mit Desai wrote: +1 non binding. -M!T On Aug 10, 2014 4:12 PM, Chen He wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 3:

[jira] [Resolved] (HDFS-3655) Datanode recoverRbw could hang sometime

2014-08-10 Thread Akira AJISAKA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Akira AJISAKA resolved HDFS-3655. - Resolution: Duplicate Assignee: (was: Xiaobo Peng) Target Version/s: (w

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 RC2

2014-08-10 Thread Akira AJISAKA
-1 (non-binding) + downloaded tarball and deployed HDFS-HA cluster + confirmed HDFS Rolling Upgrade from 2.4.0 + ran some sample jobs - documents are missing in tarball In 2.4.1 release, the documents were deployed at share/doc/hadoop/ . Would you please re-create a tarball with adding -Pdoc opt

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 RC2

2014-08-10 Thread Jason Lowe
+1 (binding) - verified signatures and digests - built from source - deployed a single-node cluster - ran some sample jobs Jason On 08/06/2014 03:59 PM, Karthik Kambatla wrote: Hi folks, I have put together a release candidate (rc2) for Hadoop 2.5.0. The RC is available at: http://people.apa

Re: [VOTE] Migration from subversion to git for version control

2014-08-10 Thread Jason Lowe
+1 Jason On 08/08/2014 09:57 PM, Karthik Kambatla wrote: I have put together this proposal based on recent discussion on this topic. Please vote on the proposal. The vote runs for 7 days. 1. Migrate from subversion to git for version control. 2. Force-push to be disabled on trunk and

Re: [VOTE] Migration from subversion to git for version control

2014-08-10 Thread Andrew Wang
+1 On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: > +1 > > Alejandro > (phone typing) > > > On Aug 8, 2014, at 19:57, Karthik Kambatla wrote: > > > > I have put together this proposal based on recent discussion on this > topic. > > > > Please vote on the proposal. The vote runs fo

Re: [VOTE] Migration from subversion to git for version control

2014-08-10 Thread Alejandro Abdelnur
+1 Alejandro (phone typing) > On Aug 8, 2014, at 19:57, Karthik Kambatla wrote: > > I have put together this proposal based on recent discussion on this topic. > > Please vote on the proposal. The vote runs for 7 days. > > 1. Migrate from subversion to git for version control. > 2. Force-

Re: [VOTE] Migration from subversion to git for version control

2014-08-10 Thread Sangjin Lee
+1 (non-binding) On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Sandy Ryza wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Karthik Kambatla > wrote: > > > I have put together this proposal based on recent discussion on this > topic. > > > > Please vote on the proposal. The vote runs for 7 days. >