disclaimer, personal opinions only, I just can't be bothered to subscribe
with @apache.org right now.
On 4 February 2013 14:36, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> - Quality/completeness: for example, missing docs, buggy UIs, difficult
> setup/install, etc
>
par for the course. Have you ever used Linux?
> -
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote:
>
> Why? Can you please share some reasons?
>
> I actually think alpha and beta and stable/GA are much better way to set
> the expectation
> of the quality of a release. This has been practiced in software release
> cycle for a long time.
> Ha
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> I think that using "-(alpha,beta)" tags on the release versions is a really
> bad idea.
Why? Can you please share some reasons?
I actually think alpha and beta and stable/GA are much better way to set
the expectation
of the quality of a re
Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE created HDFS-4468:
Summary: Fix test failure for HADOOP-9252
Key: HDFS-4468
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4468
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type
I think that using "-(alpha,beta)" tags on the release versions is a really
bad idea. All releases should follow the strictly numeric
(Major.Minor.Patch) pattern that we've used for all of the releases except
the 2.0.x ones.
-- Owen
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Stack wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Would it better to have 2.0.3-alpha, 2.0.4-beta and then make 2.1 as a
> stable release? This way we just have one series (2.0.x) which is not
> suitable for general consumption.
>
>
That contains the versioning damage to the 2.0.x set. Th
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
> On Feb 1, 2013, at 2:34 AM, Tom White wrote:
> > Whereas Arun is proposing
> >
> > 2.0.0-alpha, 2.0.1-alpha, 2.0.2-alpha, 2.1.0-alpha, 2.2.0-beta, 2.3.0
> >
> > and the casual observer might expect there to be a stable 2.0.1 (say)
> > on
On Feb 1, 2013, at 2:34 AM, Tom White wrote:
> Whereas Arun is proposing
>
> 2.0.0-alpha, 2.0.1-alpha, 2.0.2-alpha, 2.1.0-alpha, 2.2.0-beta, 2.3.0
>
> and the casual observer might expect there to be a stable 2.0.1 (say)
> on seeing the existence of 2.0.2-alpha.
>
> The first three of these ar
Shubhangi Garg created HDFS-4467:
Summary: Segmentation fault in libhdfs while connecting to HDFS
and running a Hive Query
Key: HDFS-4467
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4467
Project:
