Re: Merge Namenode HA feature to 0.23

Awesome! +1! Sent from my iPhone On Mar 2, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > Namenode HA (HDFS-1623) feature is now in trunk (yay!). It adds support for > namenode high availability with active and standby namenodes, with manual > failover. I propose merging this feature to 0.23 branch

Merge Namenode HA feature to 0.23

Namenode HA (HDFS-1623) feature is now in trunk (yay!). It adds support for namenode high availability with active and standby namenodes, with manual failover. I propose merging this feature to 0.23 branch. Recently Nicholas merged protocol buffers/wire compatibility changes to 0.23. Merging Nameno

[jira] [Resolved] (HDFS-1623) High Availability Framework for HDFS NN

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers resolved HDFS-1623. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.24.0 Assignee: (was: Sanjay Radia

Re: [VOTE] Merge the HA branch to trunk tomorrow - March 2nd

Clap! Clap! Bikas On 3/2/12 5:07 PM, "Uma Maheswara Rao G" wrote: >Great Work! Congratulations to all of Us. Now trunk build will support HA >(manual failover :-) ) > >Especially we have to say many thanks to Todd, Aaron, Eli, Suresh, >Jitendra > >Great design doc by Suresh and Sanjay! > >Very

RE: [VOTE] Merge the HA branch to trunk tomorrow - March 2nd

Great Work! Congratulations to all of Us. Now trunk build will support HA (manual failover :-) ) Especially we have to say many thanks to Todd, Aaron, Eli, Suresh, Jitendra Great design doc by Suresh and Sanjay! Very good discussions and control by Konstantin and others. Hats off to Todd and A

Re: [VOTE] Merge the HA branch to trunk tomorrow - March 2nd

Congrats to all hdfs-dev, and great work! +Vinod On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: > I've finished the merge of the HA branch to trunk. Thank you very much for > holding your commits to trunk. > > Exciting times! Good work, everyone. > > -- > Aaron T. Myers > Software Engine

Re: [VOTE] Merge the HA branch to trunk tomorrow - March 2nd

I've finished the merge of the HA branch to trunk. Thank you very much for holding your commits to trunk. Exciting times! Good work, everyone. -- Aaron T. Myers Software Engineer, Cloudera On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: > Since it looks like there are no objections to

Re: [VOTE] Merge the HA branch to trunk tomorrow - March 2nd

Since it looks like there are no objections to the merge, I'm going to go ahead and do it at 4:30pm PT today. At that time, please refrain from committing to trunk until I've given the all clear. Thanks to all who voted. Best, Aaron -- Aaron T. Myers Software Engineer, Cloudera On Thu, Mar 1,

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-3043) HA: ZK-based client proxy provider

HA: ZK-based client proxy provider -- Key: HDFS-3043 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3043 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: New Feature Components: ha, hdfs client Reporter

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-3042) Automatic failover support for NN HA

Automatic failover support for NN HA Key: HDFS-3042 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3042 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: New Feature Components: ha, name-node Report

Re: [VOTE] Merge the HA branch to trunk tomorrow - March 2nd

+1 from me. Excited for the big merge. -Todd On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > +1 > > > Good to hear that the bugs and warnings in the HA branch are fixed and we > finally have a stable build.  The tests do not appear to be as flaky as > previously described.  HA is an inval

Re: [VOTE] Merge the HA branch to trunk tomorrow - March 2nd

+1 Good to hear that the bugs and warnings in the HA branch are fixed and we finally have a stable build.  The tests do not appear to be as flaky as previously described.  HA is an invaluable feature.  It is great that we could merge the HA branch back to trunk. Thanks. Nicholas ___

Re: [VOTE] Merge the HA branch to trunk tomorrow - March 2nd

+1 On Thursday, March 1, 2012, Aaron T. Myers wrote: > Hello HDFS devs, > > As mentioned in a thread started last week, I'd like to merge the HA branch > to trunk. I had originally intended to do this yesterday, but ran into some > last minute issues, and as such would like to do it tomorrow. > >

[jira] [Resolved] (HDFS-140) When a file is deleted, its blocks remain in the blocksmap till the next block report from Datanode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G resolved HDFS-140. -- Resolution: Won't Fix As this is a improvement and not a serious issue for 1.X versions,

Hadoop-Hdfs-0.23-Build - Build # 185 - Unstable

See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-0.23-Build/185/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 14319 lines...] [INFO] Building war: /home/jenkins/j

Jenkins build became unstable: Hadoop-Hdfs-0.23-Build #185

See

Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk - Build # 972 - Unstable

See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk/972/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 12029 lines...] [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.0:attach-de