Maybe I haven't done enough haskell, but enough lisp to NOT eat _2_ Kg
of chocolate.
Did you really think you would get those 2 Kg's down?
/Gf
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Andrew Coppin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The other day, I sat down to eat a 2 Kg block of chocolate - one of those
> on
Oh, yeah, I thought you really meant that you would force that "baby" down. :)
Nice to hear that you wouldn't. Not even "lazy evaluation" would save
you there 7-8 hours later.
;)
/Gf
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Andrew Coppin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Are we assuming the bars to have an even distribution of mass along
the whole body?
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Achim Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jon Fairbairn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Adrian Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I often wonder how many cuts you need t
Throw the "no free lunch"-theorem on top of that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_free_lunch_theorem
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Dominic Steinitz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adrian Neumann inf.fu-berlin.de> writes:
>
>>
>> I often wonder how many cuts you need to divide a steak in n pieces.
Nice set of games :)
Truly a source of inspiration for programming.
/Gianfranco
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 5:11 AM, David Stigant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Tatham has a sudoku program which generates Sudoku's of any size in
> varying difficulties:
>
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgta
Is it crash / bug -free?
I know this has been a big issue with WxHaskell, something that made me use HGL.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 3:45 AM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just want to congratulate the wxHaskell team on their new release.
> With GHC 6.10 RC, cabal 1.6, and cabal-install
As far as I know, wxHaskell was developed mainly for windows?
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Andrew Coppin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason Dusek wrote:
>>
>> Andrew Coppin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> What I *haven't* done yet is read the chapters where they try
>>> to claim that
http://writert.blogspot.com/2008/12/quickchecking-code-i-c.html
/Gf
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
A very nice initiative I must say; although the page should contain
the usual explanation for why such a split method can't be universal.
That is, add the same explanation you give every time; but to the
page.
/Gianfranco
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Brent Yorgey wrote:
> Today yet another n
gey wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 05:39:55PM +0100, Gianfranco Alongi wrote:
>> A very nice initiative I must say; although the page should contain
>> the usual explanation for why such a split method can't be universal.
>> That is, add the same explanation you give ever
Looks, good, actually among the top of the ones I like,
should we not have some kind of voting mechanism for selecting a logo?
And also some kind of last date for when entries are accepted..
Of course this requires a call for logos and so forth.
2008/12/15 Jeff Heard :
> My entry...
>
> 2008/12/1
Obviously there are a lot of different wills in this discussion, and I
propose we take this to the next level by letting people submit all
their ideas to the Haskell wiki page, and vote later on.
/Gf
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 9:52 AM, jagrhask wrote:
> Miguel Mitrofanov пишет:
>>
>> Sorry to disap
I agree on what some people say; I see no point in trying to advertise
"elitism".
Let's avoid the same mistake as the linux community made; soon we'll
have an internal flame war about which monad is the best (linux
distribution flame-wars analog), arguing who's the most 31337 haxxor
and so on.
In
2008/12/17 wman <666w...@gmail.com>:
> 2008/12/17 Tristan Seligmann
>>
>> I really don't think that including a visual pun on the (>>=)
>> operator translates to "Haskell, it's all about monads"; you're only
>> likely to recognise the pun after you already know about monads anyway.
>
> True, tr
il Malde wrote:
> "Gianfranco Alongi" writes:
>
>> I agree on what some people say; I see no point in trying to advertise
>> "elitism".
>
> For this reason, my favorite subtitle is "pure . lazy . fun". Nice
> and friendly, with some doulbe mea
This is ... disturbing.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, for those wondering why Jon Harrop would say such an unusual
> thing on the Haskell list, have a look at his contributions over on the
> OCaml list,
>
>http://article.gmane.org/gmane.c
I'm a big fan of TDD and tend to approach all languages by learning
how to TDD in them.
As such, you mention that this is similar, could you please send some
links about this?
Cheers!
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
> I am glad to announce the first public release of tes
17 matches
Mail list logo
