Re: [Haskell-cafe] LLVM Backend status

2013-06-28 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
B B wrote: > Great! > Its very very nice to hear that! > > Has Haskell somewhere a technical documentation focused on LLVM usage? (for > exampel about GHC's custom calling convention) Root page of the compiler comentary is here: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Commentary/Compiler

Re: [Haskell-cafe] LLVM Backend status

2013-06-28 Thread B B
Great! Its very very nice to hear that! Has Haskell somewhere a technical documentation focused on LLVM usage? (for exampel about GHC's custom calling convention) 2013/6/28 Erik de Castro Lopo > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > B B wrote: > > > > > 1) Is the LLVM Backend actively developed or

Re: [Haskell-cafe] LLVM Backend status

2013-06-27 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > B B wrote: > > > 1) Is the LLVM Backend actively developed or should I be afraid it will be > > discontinued or broken? > > My understanding is that it is being actively developed. Currently for > numerical code, the LLVM backend performs better than the native codeg

Re: [Haskell-cafe] LLVM Backend status

2013-06-27 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
B B wrote: > 1) Is the LLVM Backend actively developed or should I be afraid it will be > discontinued or broken? My understanding is that it is being actively developed. Currently for numerical code, the LLVM backend performs better than the native codegen. I also think that the LLVM backend is

Re: [Haskell-cafe] LLVM Backend status

2013-06-27 Thread Taylor Hedberg
B B, Thu 2013-06-27 @ 20:55:57+0200: > 2) How can I generate the LLVM IR (or bc) files from the compiler? I > see that durign compilation with -fllvm -v3 flags the bc files are > created but they are immidietly (after usage) deleted - Is it possible > to tell the compiler not to delete them? You c