> Please excuse me if anyone feels that this email isn't
> appropriate for this mailing list. Though these are somewhat
> Debian-specific questions, I thought that some Haskell folks
> could lent their insight. You would be the users after all.
Also see the recent discussion on glasgow-haskel
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 11:36:59AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The package could install binary files, but then it would build-depend
> on ghc which doesn't exist for several Debian platforms. So I guess
> it could check to see if ghc is installed on the building computer and
> stick binarie
...
> So I'm considering sticking the *.lhs files for HUnit, for example, in
> /usr/share/hunit. Then people can alter their Makefiles to include
> that directory in either hugs or ghc, but I see one problem with that:
> GHC would want to compile the source files, and stick them in
> /usr/share/h
I'm considering packaging several Haskell libraries for Debian, and
wonder what people think about where things should go.
Please excuse me if anyone feels that this email isn't appropriate for
this mailing list. Though these are somewhat Debian-specific
questions, I thought that some Haskell fol
