> First question. As I saw in sources, both hxt and haxml uses [Char]'s.
> this is very inefficient. I want to know, does any effective parser for
> haskell, written in haskell, exists.
The TagSoup parser can generate ByteString syntax trees - but they're
quite a bit slower than [Char] versions. I
You might want to consider SVG only as an output format.
As a graphics format it is very baroque with many special cases and
sundry obscure corners. If you like grand challenges, round-tripping
SVG might be interesting. Unfortunately this would likely consume all
the effort that you would otherwis
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Permjacov Evgeniy wrote:
First question. As I saw in sources, both hxt and haxml uses [Char]'s.
this is very inefficient. I want to know, does any effective parser for
haskell, written in haskell, exists. Efficient means using ByteString to
store strings and possibly buildin
First question. As I saw in sources, both hxt and haxml uses [Char]'s.
this is very inefficient. I want to know, does any effective parser for
haskell, written in haskell, exists. Efficient means using ByteString to
store strings and possibly building representations that shares one
string for all
