Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 08:36 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
>> If you want to send me a patch that makes it an option (not mandatory),
>> I would be happy to apply it.
>
> When reviewing it do consider the new Unicode IO library.
>
> http://ghcmutterings.wordpress.com/2009/09/30
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 08:36 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> If you want to send me a patch that makes it an option (not mandatory),
> I would be happy to apply it.
When reviewing it do consider the new Unicode IO library.
http://ghcmutterings.wordpress.com/2009/09/30/heads-up-what-you-need-to-know-a
Date: Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:31 PM
> Subject: [Haskell-cafe] suggestion for hslogger
> To: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
>
>
> Hello,
> I have a program that does a lot of unicode manipulation. I'd like
> to use hslogger to log various operations.
> However, since
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 14:31 -0400, Sean McLaughlin wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I have a program that does a lot of unicode manipulation. I'd like
> to use hslogger to log various operations.
> However, since hslogger uses System.IO.putX, the unicode comes out
> mangled. I hacked the source to
> use
Forwarding on to the maintainer, in case he's not on the list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sean McLaughlin
Date: Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:31 PM
Subject: [Haskell-cafe] suggestion for hslogger
To: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Hello,
I have a program that does a lot of un
Hello,
I have a program that does a lot of unicode manipulation. I'd like to use
hslogger to log various operations.
However, since hslogger uses System.IO.putX, the unicode comes out mangled.
I hacked the source to
use System.IO.UTF8 instead, but it would be nice if that was an option so I
don
