On Jun 27, 2006, at 10:35 AM, Brian Hulley wrote:
I suppose they are the exception that proves the rule... :-)
Seems like there's a real opportunity here for someone who works in the
area of inference systems for error handling ... .
(Hmmm, pun-potential may not be the best way to pick a re
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Brian Hulley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
It is defnitely *a* haskell. There is actually no word in English
with a silent 'h', though this statement is unfortunately
controversial and news to whoever wrote the spell checker used in
many printed publications.
"There is
Brian, mmm, no you wasn't missing the point : actually, i asked if we
bind against c or c++. But that way, you answer the "general
guidelines" part of the question.
thx
thu
2006/6/27, minh thu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Brian, Bulat, thank you,
thu
___
Ha
Brian, Bulat, thank you,
thu
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Hello Brian,
Tuesday, June 27, 2006, 2:43:15 AM, you wrote:
> achieve a goal. One other thing to bear in mind is that foreign calls are
> extremely slow, so for example it is much faster to use the
> Foreign.Marshal.Array and Foreign.C.String functions to allocate and
> populate a temporary arr
Quoting Brian Hulley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
It is defnitely *a* haskell. There is actually no word in English
with a silent 'h', though this statement is unfortunately
controversial and news to whoever wrote the spell checker used in
many printed publications.
"There is no English word with a
Brian Hulley wrote:
minh thu wrote
* for c++, is it better to first write a c api for the c++ code before
writing the binding
[snip]
class TimerFactory {
static void Construct();
static void Destruct();
};
then the C api functions are given names like:
xxx_TimerConstru
minh thu wrote:
about writing an haskell (or is it *a* haskell ?) binding for a c or a
It is defnitely *a* haskell. There is actually no word in English with a
silent 'h', though this statement is unfortunately controversial and news to
whoever wrote the spell checker used in many printed pub
hi,
hopefully (well, i liked the discussions) this message will not spawn
so much messages :)
i'd like to know if there exist some general guidelines/information
about writing an haskell (or is it *a* haskell ?) binding for a c or a
c++ library.
i worry about :
* implementation tools : use tool
