On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Edward Kmett wrote:
> That actually runs contrary to one of cabal's other practices, which is to
> add a 'simple' Setup.hs to your package as it makes the sdist is one is not
> present.
er.. I meant "if one is not present."
__
That actually runs contrary to one of cabal's other practices, which is to
add a 'simple' Setup.hs to your package as it makes the sdist is one is not
present. With your proposed change, it would then complain about _every_
package that used simple. ;)
Setup.hs exists so that you can execute runha
Mark Wotton wrote:
> Perhaps cabal should print a warning if you have a Setup.hs file,
> _and_ try to use Simple? It'd at least give the hint that they're
> unhappy together.
I think it should instead verify that Setup.hs is consistent with a
Simple build. I don't know how much variation exists
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 04:58, Mark Wotton wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:33 PM, wren ng thornton wrote:
>> Magnus Therning wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:52, Ross Paterson wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:31:21AM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 2
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 03:33, wren ng thornton wrote:
> Magnus Therning wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:52, Ross Paterson wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:31:21AM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:59, Ross Paterson
wrote:
>
> Magnus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/22/10 09:44 , Magnus Therning wrote:
> All right, so why would cabal want to avoid compiling the Setup.hs?
>
> Of course this behaviour of cabal's means that I in the future will use
> *Custom*
> all the time, since I otherwise have to remember
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:33 PM, wren ng thornton wrote:
> Magnus Therning wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:52, Ross Paterson wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:31:21AM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:59, Ross Paterson
wrote:
>
> Mag
Magnus Therning wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:52, Ross Paterson wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:31:21AM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:59, Ross Paterson wrote:
Magnus is building by directly running the Setup.hs himself, which ignores
the Build-Type. To get c
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:52, Ross Paterson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:31:21AM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:59, Ross Paterson wrote:
>> > Magnus is building by directly running the Setup.hs himself, which ignores
>> > the Build-Type. To get cabal-install
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:31:21AM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:59, Ross Paterson wrote:
> > Magnus is building by directly running the Setup.hs himself, which ignores
> > the Build-Type. To get cabal-install to use his Setup.hs, the Build-Type
> > must be set to Cus
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:59, Ross Paterson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:43:16AM -0700, Rogan Creswick wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> > I am successfully using hooks with the following in my .cabal file:
>> >
>> > Build-Type : Simple
>>
>> I've
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:43:16AM -0700, Rogan Creswick wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> > I am successfully using hooks with the following in my .cabal file:
> >
> > Build-Type : Simple
>
> I've been unable to reproduce this -- flipping the build type to
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 17:43, Rogan Creswick wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>>
>> I am successfully using hooks with the following in my .cabal file:
>>
>> Build-Type : Simple
>>
>> and my main in Setup.hs looks like this:
>>
>> main = defaultMainWithHo
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>
> I am successfully using hooks with the following in my .cabal file:
>
> Build-Type : Simple
>
> and my main in Setup.hs looks like this:
>
> main = defaultMainWithHooks $ simpleUserHooks
> { cleanHook = profileClean
>
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 04:53, Rogan Creswick wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Tom Hawkins wrote:
>>
>> Thanks. I tried this, but it appears cabal-install ignores the
>> Setup.hs file. The only way I could get it to take is if I run
>> 'runhaskell Setup.hs configure' directly. I alway
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Tom Hawkins wrote:
>
> Thanks. I tried this, but it appears cabal-install ignores the
> Setup.hs file. The only way I could get it to take is if I run
> 'runhaskell Setup.hs configure' directly. I always assumed
> cabal-install runs Setup.hs under the hood, but
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Stephen Tetley
wrote:
> Hi Tom
>
> This will the job for a UserHooks - probably preBuild? - see
> Distribution.Simple.UserHooks.
>
> postConf - Hook to run after configure command
> preBuild - Hook to run before build command. Second arg indicates
> verbosity leve
Hi Tom
This will the job for a UserHooks - probably preBuild? - see
Distribution.Simple.UserHooks.
postConf - Hook to run after configure command
preBuild - Hook to run before build command. Second arg indicates
verbosity level.
buildHook - Over-ride this hook to get different behaviour during bu
I have a script I'm using to generate some Haskell code for a library.
How do I specify this flow in the cabal setup file? Would someone
point me to a relevant library I can reference as an example?
-Tom
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haske
19 matches
Mail list logo
