Hello Frederick,
Thursday, February 1, 2007, 6:11:32 PM, you wrote:
> And we have reached the monadic equivalent of Schrodinger's cat.
yes, it's exact reason why we love monads - the appropriate fruits in
container are appeared depending on environment where it's used. you
send probabilistic con
so are monads whats holding the nuclear waste or whats holding the apples?
;)
On 2/1/07, Frederick Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And we have reached the monadic equivalent of Schrodinger's cat.
On 1/31/07, Eric Y. Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Haskellers,
>
> In the recent HWN, I no
And we have reached the monadic equivalent of Schrodinger's cat.
On 1/31/07, Eric Y. Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Haskellers,
In the recent HWN, I noticed a new monad metaphor by Don Stewart:
Think of a monad as a spacesuite full of nuclear waste in the ocean next to a
container of a
Dear Haskellers,
In the recent HWN, I noticed a new monad metaphor by Don Stewart:
Think of a monad as a spacesuite full of nuclear waste in the ocean next to a
container of apples. now, you can't put oranges in the space suite or the
nucelar waste falls in the ocean, *but* the apples are ca
