but the rest of it looks like a fat lady bending over.
2009/3/21 Henning Thielemann
>
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Jon Fairbairn wrote:
>
> ::Haskell
>>
>
> See the lamp in logo 33 at
> http://www.haskell.org/logos/poll.html
>
> ___
> Haskell-Cafe mailing
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Jon Fairbairn wrote:
::Haskell
See the lamp in logo 33 at
http://www.haskell.org/logos/poll.html
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Achim Schneider writes:
> :: might be truly Haskell in the sense that everybody else uses
> plain :, but I don't want Haskell to be associated with squareness, and
> typing, by itself, is hardly a distinguishing property of Haskell.
I guess laziness is the most distinguishing property, and there
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:52:49PM +0100, Achim Schneider wrote:
> Jon Fairbairn wrote:
>
> > That's where that particular design falls down. >>= is an
> > ugly symbol in the first place, and while the pun with a
> > lambda in the middle provides some intellectual
> > satisfaction, it doesn't out
Jon Fairbairn wrote:
> That's where that particular design falls down. >>= is an
> ugly symbol in the first place, and while the pun with a
> lambda in the middle provides some intellectual
> satisfaction, it doesn't outweigh the fussiness of its shape
> or the irrelevant associations. I hadn't t
Warren Harris writes:
> Hi Jon,
>
> I agree with much of your rant, and would agree that the
> logo is probably the least interesting about haskell, but I
> think that it's worth spending a little time to spiffy up
> haskell's image from a marketing perspective.
I don't disagree with that. I'
> I propose to use concordet voting to appoint a new king from the 100
> aspiring candidates ... ;)
Good point.. Just noticed that I managed to misspell Don Stewart's
name :( Sorry! And thanks for pointing that out!
Speaking of Concordet voiting.. :)
Have you checked out Arrow's impossibility th
Anton Tayanovskyy wrote:
> Didn't Haskell have a syntax king? I vote for a logo king: let Don
> Steward decide which logo is best. --A
I propose to use concordet voting to appoint a new king from the 100
aspiring candidates ... ;)
Regards,
apfelmus
--
http://apfelmus.nfshost.com
__
Didn't Haskell have a syntax king? I vote for a logo king: let Don
Steward decide which logo is best. --A
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Hi Jon,
I agree with much of your rant, and would agree that the logo is
probably the least interesting about haskell, but I think that it's
worth spending a little time to spiffy up haskell's image from a
marketing perspective. Although I downplayed much of my design
decisions by focusin
I agree...
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Neil Mitchell wrote:
> >> semi-rant warning:
> >>
> >> This whole badge/logo business seems to me to be an excellent example
> >> of Parkinson's law of triviality (choosing the colour of the
> >> bikeshed). We have a large (too large) number of variati
> "Neil" == Neil Mitchell writes:
>>> semi-rant warning:
>>>
>>> This whole badge/logo business seems to me to be an excellent
>>> example of Parkinson's law of triviality (choosing the colour
>>> of the bikeshed). We have a large (too large) number of
>>> variations
>> semi-rant warning:
>>
>> This whole badge/logo business seems to me to be an excellent example
>> of Parkinson's law of triviality (choosing the colour of the
>> bikeshed). We have a large (too large) number of variations on
>> relatively few themes and a really sophisticated voting system, but
Jon Fairbairn wrote:
>
> semi-rant warning:
>
> This whole badge/logo business seems to me to be an excellent example
> of Parkinson's law of triviality (choosing the colour of the
> bikeshed). We have a large (too large) number of variations on
> relatively few themes and a really sophisticated
Warren Harris writes:
> After spending a bit of time trying to decide how to vote, I
> ended up deciding that my favorite would be a hybrid of
> several of the designs (#9 & #49 FalconNL, and #50 George
> Pollard). It's probably too late to include this in the
> voting, but here it is nonethel
15 matches
Mail list logo
