> So in general, think hard about missing capabilities in Haskell:
>
>* tools
>* libraries
>* infrastructure
>
> that benefit the broadest number of Haskell users or developers.
>
> Another route is to identify a clear niche where Haskell could leap
> ahead of the competition, with a sm
gwern0:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:49 AM, John Lato wrote:
> > Johan Tibell wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Felipe Lessa
> >> wrote:
> >>> Do we already have enough information to turn
> >>> http://okmij.org/ftp/Haskell/Iteratee/ into a nice, generic, cabalized
> >>> package? I th
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:49 AM, John Lato wrote:
> Johan Tibell wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Felipe Lessa wrote:
>>> Do we already have enough information to turn
>>> http://okmij.org/ftp/Haskell/Iteratee/ into a nice, generic, cabalized
>>> package? I think Iteratees may prove th
Johan Tibell wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Felipe Lessa wrote:
>> Do we already have enough information to turn
>> http://okmij.org/ftp/Haskell/Iteratee/ into a nice, generic, cabalized
>> package? I think Iteratees may prove themselves as useful as
>> ByteStrings.
>
> I still haven't
