side tangent ... I wrote a posix real-time package and it sits now in System
1) I'm sure it can be improved I purposely tried to keep the API close
to the Posix real-time API; however, I am open to suggestions about the
implementation itself and also the API
2) I am looking at changing the
On 2008 Sep 30, at 10:25, John Goerzen wrote:
Galchin, Vasili wrote:
Frank mode on ... ;^) In terms of functionality, where is
Haskell
superior vs inferior to ML, Caml, OCaml, F#, Erlang, etc.? E.g. in
terms
of library functionality?
* Two list-like types. Standard list was strict,
Galchin, Vasili wrote:
> Hello,
>
>Frank mode on ... ;^) In terms of functionality, where is Haskell
> superior vs inferior to ML, Caml, OCaml, F#, Erlang, etc.? E.g. in terms
> of library functionality?
I used OCaml for a little while before I moved to Haskell.
In some ways, such as the
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 11:53:02 Manlio Perillo wrote:
> Galchin, Vasili ha scritto:
> > Hello,
> >
> >Frank mode on ... ;^) In terms of functionality, where is Haskell
> > superior vs inferior to ML, Caml, OCaml, F#, Erlang, etc.? E.g. in terms
> > of library functionality?
>
> The "a
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 08:40:51 Mitchell, Neil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For libraries F# is probably superior to all, as it has libraries for
> virtually everything, and can interoperate seamlessly with COM and .NET.
> I doubt there will be any library functionality that can't be found or
> bought.
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 01:55 -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
> dons:
> > kr.angelov:
> > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > There's almost 800 Haskell libraries on hackage.haskell.org (millions of
> > > > lines of code). On average, 2 new libraries are relea
Here's the original file:
http://blog.well-typed.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/package-sizes-all-crop.png
The area of each package is determined by the number of packages that
depend on it.
-chris
On 30 sep 2008, at 13:08, Jim Burton wrote:
Don Stewart-2 wrote:
[...]
Haskell was in t
Don Stewart-2 wrote:
>
> [...]
> Haskell was in the nice position
> of already having such a process underway,
>
> http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haskell_Platform
>
Hi Don, I'm curious -- what do the images on that page represent? Can you
link to readable versions? Thanks,
Jim
> Enj
Galchin, Vasili ha scritto:
Hello,
Frank mode on ... ;^) In terms of functionality, where is Haskell
superior vs inferior to ML, Caml, OCaml, F#, Erlang, etc.? E.g. in terms
of library functionality?
The "advantage" of F# is that you get all the .NET framework (but this
leaves me s
- is the programs are not registered by Cabal issue going to be
fixed before platform release?
No. Not the right thing for cabal the package system to do.
Huh? Having tool availability out in the open, as updateable packages,
would be more flexible than the current built-in stuff in cabal
claus.reinke:
> >for the libraries?
> >
> > * http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haskell_Platform
>
> You might have mentioned that there is finally a tracker (*) and
> an approximate .cabal meta-package (for dependencies only).
>
> - is the programs are not registered by Cabal issue going to be
>
for the libraries?
* http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haskell_Platform
You might have mentioned that there is finally a tracker (*) and
an approximate .cabal meta-package (for dependencies only).
- is the programs are not registered by Cabal issue going to be
fixed before platform release?
dons:
> kr.angelov:
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > There's almost 800 Haskell libraries on hackage.haskell.org (millions of
> > > lines of code). On average, 2 new libraries are released each day
> > > (though 12 new libs were released in the last
kr.angelov:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There's almost 800 Haskell libraries on hackage.haskell.org (millions of
> > lines of code). On average, 2 new libraries are released each day
> > (though 12 new libs were released in the last 24 hours). That'
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's almost 800 Haskell libraries on hackage.haskell.org (millions of
> lines of code). On average, 2 new libraries are released each day
> (though 12 new libs were released in the last 24 hours). That's 700 new
> librarie
vigalchin:
>ok .. is there a "roadmap" for Haskell??
for the language?
* http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5177116830079185902
for the compiler?
* http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/Releases
for the libraries?
* http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haskell_Platfor
ok .. is there a "roadmap" for Haskell??
Vasili
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> noteed:
> > Haskell is growing really fast (in community, libraries and tools). But,
> Vasili,
> > Dons pushes a lot into Arch, so although he gives a correct statement,
> y
> > For libraries F# is probably superior to all, as it has
> libraries for
> > virtually everything, and can interoperate seamlessly with
> COM and .NET.
> > I doubt there will be any library functionality that can't
> be found or
> > bought.
>
> Libraries for monad transformers
I found lot
neil.mitchell.2:
>
> Hi,
>
> For libraries F# is probably superior to all, as it has libraries for
> virtually everything, and can interoperate seamlessly with COM and .NET.
> I doubt there will be any library functionality that can't be found or
> bought.
Libraries for monad transformers or com
Hi,
For libraries F# is probably superior to all, as it has libraries for
virtually everything, and can interoperate seamlessly with COM and .NET.
I doubt there will be any library functionality that can't be found or
bought.
Thanks
Neil
--
Hello,
noteed:
> Haskell is growing really fast (in community, libraries and tools). But,
> Vasili,
> Dons pushes a lot into Arch, so although he gives a correct statement, you
> shouldn't build your point of view relying only on that part of his answer
>
> Just rember the number about the Haskell l
2008/9/30 Galchin, Vasili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> thanks .. ... just trying to get an objective viewpoint and see where the
> "holes" are ...
>
[...]
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
[...]
>> Without more information, all we can really do is an overview.
thanks .. ... just trying to get an objective viewpoint and see where the
"holes" are ...
Vasili
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> vigalchin:
> >Hello,
> >
> > Frank mode on ... ;^) In terms of functionality, where is
> Haskell
> >superi
vigalchin:
>Hello,
>
> Frank mode on ... ;^) In terms of functionality, where is Haskell
>superior vs inferior to ML, Caml, OCaml, F#, Erlang, etc.? E.g. in terms
>of library functionality?
>
Without more information, all we can really do is an overview.
There's almost 8
Hello,
Frank mode on ... ;^) In terms of functionality, where is Haskell
superior vs inferior to ML, Caml, OCaml, F#, Erlang, etc.? E.g. in terms of
library functionality?
Regards, Vasili
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
htt
25 matches
Mail list logo
