Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell-cafe reply-to etiquette

2007-12-29 Thread Ketil Malde
"Albert Y. C. Lai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > B. This mailing list sets the "List-Post" header: > > List-Post: > > Progressive mail clients honour this, e.g., Evolution. Thus you are > given three buttons: I'm rather tied to my MUA, and while I'm not complaini

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell-cafe reply-to etiquette

2007-12-28 Thread Albert Y. C. Lai
Justin Bailey wrote: When I joined the haskell-cafe mailing list, I was surprised to see the "reply-to" header on each message was set to the sender of a given message to the list, rather than the list itself. That seemed counter to other mailing lists I had been subscribed to, but I didn't think

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell-cafe reply-to etiquette

2007-12-27 Thread Lutz Donnerhacke
* Justin Bailey wrote: > When I joined the haskell-cafe mailing list, I was surprised to see > the "reply-to" header on each message was set to the sender of a given > message to the list, rather than the list itself. That's good practice. > That seemed counter to other mailing lists I had been s

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell-cafe reply-to etiquette

2007-12-27 Thread Tom Phoenix
On Dec 27, 2007 3:36 PM, Justin Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I joined the haskell-cafe mailing list, I was surprised to see > the "reply-to" header on each message was set to the sender of a given > message to the list, rather than the list itself. That seemed counter > to other mailin

[Haskell-cafe] Haskell-cafe reply-to etiquette

2007-12-27 Thread Justin Bailey
When I joined the haskell-cafe mailing list, I was surprised to see the "reply-to" header on each message was set to the sender of a given message to the list, rather than the list itself. That seemed counter to other mailing lists I had been subscribed to, but I didn't think too much about it. We