On 8/13/11 5:39 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 13.08.2011, 12:57 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Maybe it would already help to add a "changelog-file" field to .cabal,
just as with license-file, and reject packages on hackage that do not
have this field and file, and later deci
On 14 August 2011 01:13, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> But I think David is suggesting to adapt a similarly formatted changelog
> file for Cabal packages, e.g. to display them on hackage. I am all for
> that, as long as it does not prevent the introduction of changelogs
> (e.g. by excessive bikesheddi
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 13.08.2011, 12:57 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> Maybe it would already help to add a "changelog-file" field to .cabal,
> just as with license-file, and reject packages on hackage that do not
> have this field and file, and later decide if we need a more
> standardized forma
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Sonntag, den 14.08.2011, 00:29 +1000 schrieb Ivan Lazar Miljenovic:
>> On 14 August 2011 00:25, David Fox wrote:
>> > Debian's packaging has a very strict changelog format where each entry
>> > combines a log entry with the pac
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 14.08.2011, 00:29 +1000 schrieb Ivan Lazar Miljenovic:
> On 14 August 2011 00:25, David Fox wrote:
> > Debian's packaging has a very strict changelog format where each entry
> > combines a log entry with the package name, the version number, the
> > author's name and email, an
On 14 August 2011 00:25, David Fox wrote:
>
> Debian's packaging has a very strict changelog format where each entry
> combines a log entry with the package name, the version number, the
> author's name and email, and the date. This creates a very nice,
> centralized, authoritative source for the
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
wrote:
> On 13 August 2011 20:57, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>> Maybe it would already help to add a "changelog-file" field to .cabal,
>> just as with license-file, and reject packages on hackage that do not
>> have this field and file, and late
On 13 August 2011 20:57, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Maybe it would already help to add a "changelog-file" field to .cabal,
> just as with license-file, and reject packages on hackage that do not
> have this field and file, and later decide if we need a more
> standardized format for changelogs.
I
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 13.08.2011, 08:11 +0200 schrieb Luite Stegeman:
> often when a new version of a package is available on hackage, I want
> to see what has changed since the previous release. Unfortunately many
> packages don't have a changelog
this is something that should be changed! Reviewi
Wow, really nice stuff. Great work! I'll find this very useful.
On 13 August 2011 08:11, Luite Stegeman wrote:
> hi all,
> often when a new version of a package is available on hackage, I want to see
> what has changed since the previous release. Unfortunately many packages
> don't have a changel
hi all,
often when a new version of a package is available on hackage, I want to see
what has changed since the previous release. Unfortunately many packages
don't have a changelog or a public source code repository. That's why I have
made a simple website with git repositories that contain all ve
11 matches
Mail list logo
