On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Nicolas Trangez wrote:
> I did use that a couple of times (`xor`ing 2 ByteStrings together), and was
> surprised by the omission back then, but IIRC (can't validate now), there's
> a specialised zipWith (as proposed) in the module (with some other name,
> obviousl
I did use that a couple of times (`xor`ing 2 ByteStrings together), and was
surprised by the omission back then, but IIRC (can't validate now), there's
a specialised zipWith (as proposed) in the module (with some other name,
obviously), which is not exported, but used when you 'pack' the result of
Carter: we don't have both. We have one function from each category. My
guess is nobody's ever really needed a really fast zipWith ::
(Word8->Word8->Word8) -> ByteString -> ByteString -> ByteString; that's the
only reason I can think of for its omission.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Carter
Scott: benchmark the two and you'll see why we have both :-)
On Thursday, September 12, 2013, Scott Lawrence wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Tom Ellis wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:21:20AM -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote:
>>
>>> Something's always bothered me about map and zipWith for ByteStri
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 18:24:24 +0400, Tom Ellis
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:21:20AM -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote:
Something's always bothered me about map and zipWith for ByteString.
Why is it
map :: (Word8 -> Word8) -> ByteString -> ByteString
but
zipWith :: (Word8 -> Word8
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:21:20AM -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote:
> Something's always bothered me about map and zipWith for ByteString. Why is it
>
> map :: (Word8 -> Word8) -> ByteString -> ByteString
>
> but
>
> zipWith :: (Word8 -> Word8 -> a) -> ByteString -> ByteString -> [a]
Well,
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Tom Ellis wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:21:20AM -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote:
Something's always bothered me about map and zipWith for ByteString. Why is it
map :: (Word8 -> Word8) -> ByteString -> ByteString
but
zipWith :: (Word8 -> Word8 -> a) -> ByteString
Hello all,
Something's always bothered me about map and zipWith for ByteString. Why is it
map :: (Word8 -> Word8) -> ByteString -> ByteString
but
zipWith :: (Word8 -> Word8 -> a) -> ByteString -> ByteString -> [a]
? Obviously they can be transformed into each other with pack/unpack, a