* Magnus Therning [2013-08-08 07:59:37+0200]
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 09:48:39PM +0300, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
> > I am pleased to announce the first release of tasty, a new testing
> > framework for Haskell. It is meant to be a successor to
> > test-framework (which is unmaintained).
> >
> > Ta
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 09:48:39PM +0300, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
> I am pleased to announce the first release of tasty, a new testing
> framework for Haskell. It is meant to be a successor to
> test-framework (which is unmaintained).
>
> Tasty supports HUnit, SmallCheck, QuickCheck, and golden tes
;
Do: "Jan Stolarek"
DW: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Wysłane: środa, 7 sierpień 2013 10:56:21
Temat: Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANNOUNCE: tasty, a new testing framework
It certainly can, but it doesn't do that yet. Should be very easy to
fix, though. Patches are welcome.
Roman
* Jan
haskell-cafe@haskell.org
> Wysłane: wtorek, 6 sierpień 2013 22:51:57
> Temat: Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANNOUNCE: tasty, a new testing framework
>
> * John Wiegley [2013-08-06 13:40:50-0500]
> > >>>>> Roman Cheplyaka writes:
> >
> > > I am pleased to anno
.
Janek
- Oryginalna wiadomość -
Od: "Roman Cheplyaka"
Do: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Wysłane: wtorek, 6 sierpień 2013 22:51:57
Temat: Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANNOUNCE: tasty, a new testing framework
* John Wiegley [2013-08-06 13:40:50-0500]
> >>>>> Roman Cheplyaka wr
I admit I haven't yet had the time to try out testy, but there's one thing I'm
curious about. QuickCheck can classify tests:
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
* John Wiegley [2013-08-06 13:40:50-0500]
> > Roman Cheplyaka writes:
>
> > I am pleased to announce the first release of tasty, a new testing framework
> > for Haskell. It is meant to be a successor to test-framework (which is
> > unmaintained).
>
> It would be nice to see a comparison of
> Roman Cheplyaka writes:
> I am pleased to announce the first release of tasty, a new testing framework
> for Haskell. It is meant to be a successor to test-framework (which is
> unmaintained).
It would be nice to see a comparison of the various test frameworks and why
one might select one
Awesome. Ill take a look at tasty sometime this month. Thanks for taking
the time to patiently answer all of our questions.
On Tuesday, August 6, 2013, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
> * Carter Schonwald >
> [2013-08-05 16:58:37-0400]
> > fair enough. I take it that you're also (implicitly) committing
You can find an example here:
https://github.com/feuerbach/regex-applicative/blob/master/regex-applicative.cabal#L89
If you'd like to contribute a short README section based on that, please
go ahead! :)
Roman
* Tikhon Jelvis [2013-08-06 09:29:21-0400]
> Could you add some documentation on how t
Could you add some documentation on how to use this with cabal? I've found
integrating tests with cabal unintuitive and poorly documented--to the
point where I haven't really bothered! I've gotten it working before, but I
would have to look it up again in the future. (I also didn't use a
framework.
* Carter Schonwald [2013-08-05 16:58:37-0400]
> fair enough. I take it that you're also (implicitly) committing to
> maintaining this for the next few years? :)
That's correct.
Roman
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.ha
fair enough. I take it that you're also (implicitly) committing to
maintaining this for the next few years? :)
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
> * Andrey Chudnov [2013-08-05 15:31:16-0400]
> > On 08/05/2013 02:48 PM, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
> > >(which is unmaintained).
>
On 8/5/2013 2:48 PM, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
I am pleased to announce the first release of tasty, a new testing
framework for Haskell. It is meant to be a successor to test-framework
(which is unmaintained).
Tasty supports HUnit, SmallCheck, QuickCheck, and golden tests out of
the box (through th
Oh, a new testing framework - I'm always interested in that :)
> At the very least, you'll have to change module names
> (Test.Framework -> Test.Tasty,
> Test.Framework.Providers.HUnit -> Test.Tasty.HUnit, ...),
> and wrap the top-level list of tests into a testGroup.
>
> If you have type signatu
* Andrey Chudnov [2013-08-05 15:31:16-0400]
> On 08/05/2013 02:48 PM, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
> >(which is unmaintained).
> Has this been confirmed by the author/maintainer?
I've sent a couple of emails to Max (one in January, one in April) and
haven't heard anything from him. My patches, which
Likewise, is test-framework explicitly unmaintained? I'd generally think a
testing tool should stabilize after a while... though I guess that
test-framework's author is pretty busy with some other work this year, but
I could be wrong.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Andrey Chudnov wrote:
> On 0
On 08/05/2013 02:48 PM, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
(which is unmaintained).
Has this been confirmed by the author/maintainer?
Tasty supports HUnit, SmallCheck, QuickCheck, and golden tests out of
the box (through the standard packages), but it is very extensible, so
you can write your own test pr
I am pleased to announce the first release of tasty, a new testing
framework for Haskell. It is meant to be a successor to test-framework
(which is unmaintained).
Tasty supports HUnit, SmallCheck, QuickCheck, and golden tests out of
the box (through the standard packages), but it is very extensibl
19 matches
Mail list logo
