On 11-05-30 05:05 AM, Alexey Khudyakov wrote:
On 30.05.2011 12:26, Bas van Dijk wrote:
On 30 May 2011 00:14, Alexey Khudyakov wrote:
It always puzzled me why there are no packages for for testing general
type classes laws. (Monoid laws, monad laws etc). It looks like ideal
case for quickcheck a
On 30.05.2011 14:45, Henning Thielemann wrote:
Alexey Khudyakov schrieb:
On 30.05.2011 12:26, Bas van Dijk wrote:
How about 'checkers' by Conal Elliott:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/checkers
We really need better search on hackage than C-f in browser. I didn't
find them. Thank you for
Alexey Khudyakov schrieb:
> On 30.05.2011 12:26, Bas van Dijk wrote:
>>
>> How about 'checkers' by Conal Elliott:
>> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/checkers
>>
> We really need better search on hackage than C-f in browser. I didn't
> find them. Thank you for pointers.
google with site:hackage.
On 30.05.2011 12:26, Bas van Dijk wrote:
On 30 May 2011 00:14, Alexey Khudyakov wrote:
It always puzzled me why there are no packages for for testing general
type classes laws. (Monoid laws, monad laws etc). It looks like ideal
case for quickcheck and smallcheck.
How about 'checkers' by Conal
On 30 May 2011 00:14, Alexey Khudyakov wrote:
> It always puzzled me why there are no packages for for testing general
> type classes laws. (Monoid laws, monad laws etc). It looks like ideal
> case for quickcheck and smallcheck.
How about 'checkers' by Conal Elliott:
http://hackage.haskell.org/pa
Hello
It always puzzled me why there are no packages for for testing general
type classes laws. (Monoid laws, monad laws etc). It looks like ideal
case for quickcheck and smallcheck.
I'm glad to present package quickcheck-properties[1]. It containt set
of generic properties for semiroups, monoid
