On 26 October 2011 02:17, Rustom Mody wrote:
>
> In the Data.GraphViz.Types.Generalised page you have the starting line:
>
> It is sometimes useful to be able to manipulate a Dot graph as an actual
> graph. This representation lets you do so...
>
> Evidently some other context is needed to underst
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 01:58:33PM -0700, Jason Dagit wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Brent Yorgey wrote:
> > I am pleased to announce the release of version 0.4 of diagrams, a
> > full-featured framework and embedded domain-specific language for
> > declarative drawing.
>
> What do yo
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:55:53AM -0700, David Barbour wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> Diagrams package seems it could be promising for a declarative UI model -
> i.e. integration with functional reactive programming and similar models -
> so long as I'm willing to sacrifice `native` look and feel, which do
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25 October 2011 16:02, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 24 October 2011 13:51, Rustom Mody wrote:
> >> > How does diagrams compa
On 25 October 2011 16:02, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
> wrote:
>>
>> On 24 October 2011 13:51, Rustom Mody wrote:
>> > How does diagrams compare with graphviz? If this is an inappropriate
>> > (type-wrong?) question thats ok :-) Its just that wh
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 24 October 2011 13:51, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > How does diagrams compare with graphviz? If this is an inappropriate
> > (type-wrong?) question thats ok :-) Its just that when I last looked at
> > gra
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Stephen Tetley
wrote:
> > Rustom Mody writes:
> >
> >> I remember (vaguely) a 'live page' ie where one could enter (into the
> >> browser) changes to the diagrams code and see the results immediately.
> >> Is that page there? (Or am I mixing up with something els
On 25 October 2011 04:25, Brent Yorgey wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 03:46:26PM +1100, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
>>
>> Hmmm... might be interesting to try and use dot/neato/etc. to do the
>> layout of a graph, and then use diagrams for the actual
>> visualisation...
>
> I agree! This has be
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Brent Yorgey wrote:
> I am pleased to announce the release of version 0.4 of diagrams, a
> full-featured framework and embedded domain-specific language for
> declarative drawing.
>
> The last announcement was of the 0.1 release; there have been quite a
> few chan
Thanks.
Diagrams package seems it could be promising for a declarative UI model -
i.e. integration with functional reactive programming and similar models -
so long as I'm willing to sacrifice `native` look and feel, which doesn't
seem like a big problem.
A couple more questions:
1) Am I right in
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:06:19PM -0700, David Barbour wrote:
> Is there any way to `query` a diagram, i.e. associate data with each pixel
> for mouse clicks?
Yes. Every diagram has an associated 'query function', which
associates a monoidal value to every point. By default it just
returns Tru
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 03:46:26PM +1100, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
>
> Hmmm... might be interesting to try and use dot/neato/etc. to do the
> layout of a graph, and then use diagrams for the actual
> visualisation...
I agree! This has been on my list of
things-to-do-with-diagrams-eventually
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 08:21:30AM +0530, Rustom Mody wrote:
> Thanks. This is attractive.
> I remember (vaguely) a 'live page' ie where one could enter (into the
> browser) changes to the diagrams code and see the results immediately.
> Is that page there? (Or am I mixing up with something else?)
> Rustom Mody writes:
>
>> I remember (vaguely) a 'live page' ie where one could enter (into the
>> browser) changes to the diagrams code and see the results immediately.
>> Is that page there? (Or am I mixing up with something else?)
Maybe it was Péter Diviánszky's 'dia' (entirely different to '
Rustom Mody writes:
> I remember (vaguely) a 'live page' ie where one could enter (into the
> browser) changes to the diagrams code and see the results immediately.
> Is that page there? (Or am I mixing up with something else?)
Chris Smith's web interface to Ben Lippmeier's Gloss, perhaps?
http:
Is there any way to `query` a diagram, i.e. associate data with each pixel
for mouse clicks? Or are the composition rules mostly write-only?
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Brent Yorgey wrote:
> I am pleased to announce the release of version 0.4 of diagrams, a
> full-featured framework and emb
On 24 October 2011 13:51, Rustom Mody wrote:
> How does diagrams compare with graphviz? If this is an inappropriate
> (type-wrong?) question thats ok :-) Its just that when I last looked at
> graphviz I found the documentation somewhat impenetrable -- like much else
> in Hackage -- lots of types
Thanks. This is attractive.
I remember (vaguely) a 'live page' ie where one could enter (into the
browser) changes to the diagrams code and see the results immediately.
Is that page there? (Or am I mixing up with something else?)
How does diagrams compare with graphviz? If this is an inappropria
The correct URL for the manual is:
http://projects.haskell.org/diagrams/manual/diagrams-manual.html
Ryan
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Brent Yorgey wrote:
> I am pleased to announce the release of version 0.4 of diagrams, a
> full-featured framework and embedded domain-specific language for
I am pleased to announce the release of version 0.4 of diagrams, a
full-featured framework and embedded domain-specific language for
declarative drawing.
The last announcement was of the 0.1 release; there have been quite a
few changes and improvements since then, including:
- A new website inc
20 matches
Mail list logo
