On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Simon Marlow wrote:
> There is a possibility that the IHG might fund this during the next cycle,
> which would mean that it would be in 7.6.1.
>
> Cheers,
>Simon
>
>
That is very good to hear!!!
Regards,
Kashyap
There is a possibility that the IHG might fund this during the next
cycle, which would mean that it would be in 7.6.1.
Cheers,
Simon
On 05/03/2012 07:35, Jason Dagit wrote:
I don't know if timeline has been established, but my understanding is
that there is a need for this and that the
Thank you Jason.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Jason Dagit wrote:
> I don't know if timeline has been established, but my understanding is
> that there is a need for this and that the right people are aware of
> it and looking into it.
>
> The GHC trac has a ticket for this:
> http://hackage.h
I don't know if timeline has been established, but my understanding is
that there is a need for this and that the right people are aware of
it and looking into it.
The GHC trac has a ticket for this:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1884
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:59 PM, C K Kashyap wrot
Hi All,
Can someone please let me know if there is a 64bit target on Windows on the
horizon for GHC?
I am trying to push for changing the current implementation in my
organization in C++ to Haskell - Our primary targets are Windows and Mac.
Not being able to generate 64bit DLL's on Windows would be
