On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Steffen Schuldenzucker
wrote:
>
>
> On 04/13/2012 10:49 PM, Ben Millwood wrote:
>>
>> I'm pleased to announce my first genuinely original Hackage package:
>> notcpp-0.0.1!
>>
>> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/notcpp
>>
>> [...]
>
>
> Why is it
>
>> scopeLookup
On 04/13/2012 10:49 PM, Ben Millwood wrote:
I'm pleased to announce my first genuinely original Hackage package:
notcpp-0.0.1!
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/notcpp
[...]
Why is it
> scopeLookup :: String -> Q Exp
with n bound to x :: T => @scopeLookup n@ evaluates to an Exp containing
Hi,
> scopeLookup :: String -> Q Exp
The example provided here [1] fails at runtime is no name can be
found in scope. Would it make more sense to have
scopeLookup :: [String] -> Q Exp
and have compilation fail if no name in the list is in scope?
By the way, the library brings an interesting
With the C pre processor you can write different code for windows and non
windows? Can your package achieve the same?
The name alone makes it sound like an alternative to using CPP.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskel
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012, Ben Millwood wrote:
But I never liked using CPP: it completely defeats haskell-src-exts
and hence things like SourceGraph, and anyway it's not designed for
Haskell and doesn't at all understand its structure, or fit with its
syntax. With a little thought, I wondered if crea
