given all Oracle woes in the last few months, I'd say this is a
terrible timing and terrible decision. How about instead an
experienced Haskell programmer to best leverage it rather than a
junior who's learned java at university and has just read "Learn
Haskell in 2 weeks"?
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 a
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Ryan Ingram wrote:
> Max has a good solution, but another solution is to embed an untyped
> lambda calculus into Haskell
>
> -- "atom" is just used for output during testing
> data U = Atom Int | F (U -> U)
>
> instance Show U where
> show (Atom s) = s
> show (
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Ketil Malde wrote:
> Luke Palmer writes:
>
>> To us, scripting meant short, potent code that rolled off your
>> fingers and into the computers mind, compelling it to do your job with
>> reverence to the super power you truly are.
>
> Just when I thought, oh, there
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Dan Doel wrote:
> On Thursday 04 November 2010 12:12:51 pm Jeremy O'Donoghue wrote:
>
>> Best laugh I've had in ages. Personal favourites are:
>
> The Forth one got me. I also like:
>
> OCaml: "OCaml is an attempt to implement object-oriented syntax in Caml. It is
>
I can see some haskellers grinding their teeth and hurrying to make
their own rewrite of CIL itself in haskell.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Tom Hawkins wrote:
> CIL (C Intermediate Language) [1], not to be confused with the Common
> Intermediate Language, is a mature OCaml library that parses
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:09 AM, aditya siram wrote:
> We have a Google group. Doesn't that qualify?
One can't post to Haskell Cafe through the usenet/NNTP/google group interface...
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.hask
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Hong Yang wrote:
> learn and use. In my humble opinion, Haskell has a lot of libraries, but
> most of them offer few examples of how to use the modules. In this regards,
> Perl is much much better.
The Perl call is spot on. Specially because Haskell has been
inc
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Andrew Coppin
wrote:
> Using explicit threads has the nice side-effect...
side-effects are bad! ;-)
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
heh, a Lisp-br community of about 100 people generates about some 1
message a month. I won't even try to guess 5 Haskellers from Sao
Paulo. :P
2009/5/23 Daniel Yokomizo :
> Hey, we have enough people for a São Paulo Haskell User Group.
> Anyone else interested?
>
> Best regards,
> Daniel Yokomizo
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Neil Mitchell wrote:
>> P.S. We really need such a well written style guide for
>> haskell. Python has this nice PEP (Python Enhancement
>> Proposals). Should we start making our own HEP?
>
> We have one: urchin.earth.li/~ian/style/haskell.html
It sho
2009/4/21 Edward Kmett :
> I find a hard 80 character line length limit to be somewhat ridiculous in
> this day and age. I've long since revised my personal rule of thumb upwards
> towards 132, if only because I can still show two windows of that side by
> side with no worries, along with all the I
It's surely more than enough to Haskell, Python, Perl, C++ and other
very concise and expressive languages. But for Java and the likes it
may well be just barely enough for a single *identifier* alone!! :P
2009/4/21 Dusan Kolar :
> Dear all,
>
> reading that
>
>> according the several style gui
12 matches
Mail list logo
