Although your post is a bit trollish, I answer below to clear any confusion.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:18 AM, wrote:
>
> ivan.chollet wrote:
>> let's consider the following:
>>
>> let fd = Unix.open ...
>> let fd = Unix.open ...
>>
>> At this point one file descriptor cannot be closed. Static a
purposely.
This was what I meant by my comment.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:02 PM, David Thomas wrote:
> It strikes me as unlikely static analysis would be confused by shadowing.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:37 PM, i c wrote:
>
>> let's consider the following:
&g
exts and should have different names.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> On 2013-07-22 17:09, i c wrote:
> > Usage of shadowing is generally bad practice. It is error-prone. Hides
> > obnoxious bugs like file descriptors leaks.
>
> These claims need to
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:47 AM, wrote:
>
> Jon Fairbairn wrote:
> > It just changes forgetting to use different variable names because of
> > recursion (which is currently uniform throughout the language) to
> > forgetting to use non recursive let instead of let.
>
> Let me bring to the record t
