u both have more experience with this piece of literature, how
would you interpret it? With a grain of salt or would function really mean
procedure from the viewpoint of the author?
Thank you very much in advance.
Best regards,
Rico Moorman
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Bob Hutchison wrote:
>
> regex = "]+>.*?"-
>
And mind the sneaky single "-" ... it doe not belong there ;-)
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
gex part of
Just (before, match, after) ->
BS.concat [before, replaceUTF8 match, go after]
_ -> part
The discussion back then was
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/beginners/2012-June/010064.html
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Rico Moorman
P.S.
ly not a real problem but more a cosmetic one.
I really would like to see this discussed here. What would be the good
and the bad of promoting this kind of versioning?
I am looking forward to hear what you think.
Best regards,
Rico Moorman
P.S. sorry if you got this twice but I seem to have ma
ly not a real problem but more a cosmetic one.
I really would like to see this discussed here. What would be the good and
the bad of promoting this kind of versioning.
I am looking forward to hear what you think.
Best regards,
Rico Moorman
___
Haskell-
Dear Austin,
Wouldn't it be a good idea to link the Vacuum version-number to the
related ghc version number directly as it's functionality is directly
tied to the ghc version anyway.
vacuum 7.4 for ghc 7.4; vacuum 7.2 for ghc 7.2 aso.
Best regards,
Rico Moorman
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 a
Hello,
I recently tried to install the latest version of pandoc on my debian
stable box (with ghc 6.12.1) using virthualenv as sandboxing
mechanism. But instead of a normal installation, compilation of the
json package (more specifically the Text.JSON.Parsec module) hangs and
causes ghc to consume
