askellInstalls/smallInstalls/
pureMD5-0.2.3>cabal
haddock --hyperlink-source
2008/12/21 R Hayes :
Is there a way I can get Haddock Docs WITH links to source (local)
from
modules installed with "cabal install xxx"?
Getting the docs themselves is pretty easy by changing either
~/.cab
Is there a way I can get Haddock Docs WITH links to source (local)
from modules installed with "cabal install xxx"?
Getting the docs themselves is pretty easy by changing either ~/.cabal/
config or using --enable-documentation.
Automatically generating the source (colourised or not) and in
I know that this is a resolved question, but wouldn't Huet's Zipper
also work for this
On Oct 20, 2007, at 5:26 PM, Alfonso Acosta wrote:
On 10/20/07, Mads Lindstrøm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am not a monad-expect, so I may be wrong, but wouldn't a writer
monad
be more appropriate?
shai dorsai
On Oct 18, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On Oct 18, 2007, at 19:53 , John Meacham wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 02:31:10AM +0100, PR Stanley wrote:
Do you trust mathematical materials on Wikipedia?
Certainly! I honestly think wikipedia is one of man's gr
I think Simon is right, and not just from a Haskell point of view.
Allowing a package to contain a both a library and an executable
makes the behavior of the package system less obvious. That's not to
say that it can't behave "correctly", but that it can't behave both
"correctly" and in
I don't know how many of the other people on this list are actually
going to *be* at OSCON. I will.
I think it is important to think about the kinds of problems the
audience is trying to solve, as well as the context in which they are
trying to solve them. For the most part, the attende
In general, problems that would lose millions of dollars are noticed
very quickly. Quants are constantly analyzing the sources of
shortfall in implementing strategies. Also, time to market is
generally more important than correctness. It's much better to have
a strategy that mostly wor
On Apr 17, 2007, at 4:46 PM, David Brown wrote:
R Hayes wrote:
They *enjoy* debugging ...
I have to say this is one of the best things I've found for catching
bad programmers during interviews, no matter what kind of system it is
for. I learned this the hard way after watching so
h the fact the the fusion
optimization is in the *Library*, not baked in to the compiler). At
a minimum, it shows that being able to reason about programs
rigorously can have a payoff in a currency that they value.
R Hayes
rfhayes<>@reillyhayes.com
On Apr 16
Wouldn't this be a good discussion for the Haskell Prime List?
Reilly Hayes
+1 415 388 3903 (office)
+1 415 846 1827 (mobile)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 2, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Andrzej Jaworski wrote:
I too was put off by the Num issues though--strange mixture of
sophisticated
category theory an
10 matches
Mail list logo
