Switching to Haskell Cafe; I hope you read that list, John, since it
seems more suitable to this kind of question.
John Meacham wrote:
Hi, this is to announce the release of jhc 0.6.1. The jhc homepage with
distribution information is at http://repetae.net/computer/jhc/
The main new feature
OK, I suspect this is a real newbie error, but please have mercy. I have
downloaded and installed cabal (at least it responds to the --help command
from the command line). Yet when I do, say (to give a real example):
cabal configure parameterized_ data
(having done he fetch) I get this erro
The trustworthy articles on Wikipedia have references that can be checked,
and read. The ones without references are not to be trusted..
Dave Barton
- Original Message -
From: "Philippa Cowderoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PR Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, October
Gentlefolk:
Help. I need support for a technical argument: why going to an intermediate
form for an existing functional back end like Haskell really, truly is
better for implementing a functional language than is going to an
intermediate form like the Java intermediate form and re-doing all t
Wolfgang Jeltsch writes:
- Original Message -
Am Mittwoch, 21. Dezember 2005 13:15 schrieb Creighton Hogg:
[...]
Monads, I believe, can be just thought of as containers for state.
I would say that you are talking especially about the I/O monad here. A
monad
as such is a rather
John Goerzen writes:
There was a brief discussion on #haskell today about the Haskell
standard. I'd like to get opinions from more people, and ask if there
is any effort being done in this direction presently.
I know that some people would like to hold off on such a process until
their fav
Benjamin Fransen writes:
> There *is no* difference between the two if one views them as pure
> mathematical values. Questions of run time speed or memory usage, i.e.
> efficiency (which your original question was about) are clearly outside
the
> realm of pure values, and thus we may perceive them
John Meacham writes:
> > >I am looking for the book "The implementation of Functional
> > >Programming languages" by S. L. Peyton Jones.
> > This book is out of print and currently there is no electronic version
> > of it. The Haskell bookstore folk are working on reconstructing it and
> > making
I love religious wars.
Having been around awhile, I make a prediction. This will thrash a while,
those who like graphical environments will make their points, those who like
textual environments will make their points, no one will convince anyone
else, and eventually it will die down.
In fact (i
There is also a job here:
http://www.edaptive.com/career/index.htm
It isn't exactly functional programming or Haskell, but it is related (more
so than it looks from the job description). Please do consider it, if it
sounds interesting to you.
Dave Barton
EDAptive Computing
___
All right, I know this is a stupid question. I know the models of
evaluation in call by name and call by value languages; however, I am
kind of puzzled by trying to reproduce call by name in a call by value
language using force and delay. If I put a delay around the right
side of each equation a
Tom Pledger writes:
In both of those cases, the apparent non-integer dimension is
accompanied by a particular unit (km, V). So, could they equally
well be handled by stripping away the units and exponentiating a
dimensionless number? For example:
(x / 1V) ^ y
I think not.
This is pretty rare, and it's also fairly tough to represent points in
spaces of fractional dimension. I'll bet the sorts of complications
necessary to do so would immediately exclude it from consideration in
the design of a standard library, but nevertheless would be interesting
to
13 matches
Mail list logo
