Hi everybody!
I have just released a handy package on Hackage that will interest you if
you've ever used unordered-containers with a custom type.
In order to do such a thing, you'd need to define an instance of Hashable.
This process could easily be automated.
And so I did.
{-# LANGUAGE DeriveG
Hi,
I found the problem, it solved itself with an update of the TeXLive suite...
https://github.com/kosmikus/lhs2tex/issues/24
Thanks for your help!
Andreas
On 01.11.12 11:15 PM, Dominique Devriese wrote:
Andreas,
2012/11/1 Andreas Abel :
Hello,
maybe someone has experience in publishing
Dear Haskellers,
The second year of the haskell.org committee is drawing to a close and
it is therefore time to seek replacements for those members whose term
is expiring.
This year one member has a term ending, Ganesh Sittampalam. Ganesh has been
an excellent contributor and the rest of the comm
I try to maintain some knowledge of Unicode issues, but this one never
occurred to me.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
> Would anyone care to see and comment on the proposal
> before I send it to Unicode.org? Anyone got any suggestions
> before I begin to write it?
>
I
Thanks Iavor et al.
I agree. I'll see what we can do. We have budget for this so hopefully it
will be a simple matter of finding people to implement the change.
Jason
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Iavor Diatchki wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think that getting a certificate is a good idea. I think
Hello,
I think that getting a certificate is a good idea. I think this could
probably be arranged by the haskell.org committee, which even has a budget
for things like that, I believe. I'm cc-ing Jason, who's on the committee
and might have more input on what's the best way to proceed.
Thanks f
Who is the webmaster for haskell.org? Presumably they will be required in
the process of installing the certificate.
As far as obtaining goes, one can obtain a free certificate from StartSSL -
see https://www.startssl.com
There are other CAs, but if nobody has any strong preferences, I recommend
g
Today, I encountered a strange trouble with higher-rank polymorphism. It
was finally solved by nominal typing. Was it a bug in type checker? lack of
power in type inference? or lack of my understanding? I'll submit this in
hope that it will at least result in better GHC error message some day:
My
I've been putting together a proposal for Unicode identifiers
in Erlang (it's EEP 40 if anyone wants to look it up). In
the course of this, it has turned out that there is a technical
problem for languages with case-significant identifiers.
Haskell 2010 report, chapter 2.
http://www.haskell.org/o
