On 25 October 2011 16:02, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
> wrote:
>>
>> On 24 October 2011 13:51, Rustom Mody wrote:
>> > How does diagrams compare with graphviz? If this is an inappropriate
>> > (type-wrong?) question thats ok :-) Its just that wh
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 24 October 2011 13:51, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > How does diagrams compare with graphviz? If this is an inappropriate
> > (type-wrong?) question thats ok :-) Its just that when I last looked at
> > gra
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Stephen Tetley
wrote:
> > Rustom Mody writes:
> >
> >> I remember (vaguely) a 'live page' ie where one could enter (into the
> >> browser) changes to the diagrams code and see the results immediately.
> >> Is that page there? (Or am I mixing up with something els
On 25 October 2011 13:34, wren ng thornton wrote:
> Before dealing with automatic documentation requirements, perhaps it'd be
> better to develop a standard consensus on the terms used in the stability
> field and actively advocating for people to adopt it, as was done with the
> PVP.
+1, not to
On 10/24/11 12:34 PM, Gregory Collins wrote:
Examples could include: "Your package lacks a description", "more than
X% of your modules lack toplevel module comments", "fewer than Y% of
your toplevel exports have haddock comments", etc... Packages with
stability=experimental would probably be exem
On 10/21/11 11:34 AM, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
Perhaps, unless someone step up, it would be nice to move packages that
have
no maintainer anymore into a github organisation (haskell-janitors ?),
where each package could have many owners and it's easy and simple to
add/remove push rights there.
Tha
Okay, so the problem is with cabal-install.
I'd don't verily need ghc 7.2, I think I'll just stick to 7.0.4 unti
cabal-install is updated, it will be simpler.
2011/10/24 Daniel Fischer
> On Monday 24 October 2011, 23:13:32, Yves Parès wrote:
> > I'm using GHC 7.2.1 and cabal-install 0.8 (Cabal 1
On 25 October 2011 04:25, Brent Yorgey wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 03:46:26PM +1100, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
>>
>> Hmmm... might be interesting to try and use dot/neato/etc. to do the
>> layout of a graph, and then use diagrams for the actual
>> visualisation...
>
> I agree! This has be
On Monday 24 October 2011, 23:13:32, Yves Parès wrote:
> I'm using GHC 7.2.1 and cabal-install 0.8 (Cabal 1.8.0.2), and when
> "cabal install rsa"
>
> Apparently it's an instance being declared twice.
> However RSA hackage page states that it compiles under GHC 7.2:
> http://hackage.haskell.org/p
Nope, I already have random 1.0.1.0 installed...
2011/10/24 Thomas DuBuisson
> Try to install with: cabal install RSA 'random == 1.0.1.0'
>
> I'm guessing the issue is your "random" library is less than 1.0.1 and
> also includes an instance of Word8 (in other words, the GHC release
> you use pu
Try to install with: cabal install RSA 'random == 1.0.1.0'
I'm guessing the issue is your "random" library is less than 1.0.1 and
also includes an instance of Word8 (in other words, the GHC release
you use pulled an unofficial version from the repo).
Cheers,
Thomas
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:13 P
I'm using GHC 7.2.1 and cabal-install 0.8 (Cabal 1.8.0.2), and when
"cabal install rsa"
I got the error
$ cabal install rsa
Resolving dependencies...
Configuring RSA-1.0.6.2...
Preprocessing library RSA-1.0.6.2...
Preprocessing executables for RSA-1.0.6.2...
Building RSA-1.0.6.2...
[1 of 1] Compil
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Brent Yorgey wrote:
> I am pleased to announce the release of version 0.4 of diagrams, a
> full-featured framework and embedded domain-specific language for
> declarative drawing.
>
> The last announcement was of the 0.1 release; there have been quite a
> few chan
Thanks.
Diagrams package seems it could be promising for a declarative UI model -
i.e. integration with functional reactive programming and similar models -
so long as I'm willing to sacrifice `native` look and feel, which doesn't
seem like a big problem.
A couple more questions:
1) Am I right in
Hi Rustom,
I tend to find that I use Uniplate for most stuff, and SYB for very
complex stuff (SYB is quite a bit more complicated to do the simple
things, but can do things out of reach for Uniplate). The example of
manipulating AST's is very common, and using a generics library is a
very good ide
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:06:19PM -0700, David Barbour wrote:
> Is there any way to `query` a diagram, i.e. associate data with each pixel
> for mouse clicks?
Yes. Every diagram has an associated 'query function', which
associates a monoidal value to every point. By default it just
returns Tru
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 03:46:26PM +1100, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
>
> Hmmm... might be interesting to try and use dot/neato/etc. to do the
> layout of a graph, and then use diagrams for the actual
> visualisation...
I agree! This has been on my list of
things-to-do-with-diagrams-eventually
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 08:21:30AM +0530, Rustom Mody wrote:
> Thanks. This is attractive.
> I remember (vaguely) a 'live page' ie where one could enter (into the
> browser) changes to the diagrams code and see the results immediately.
> Is that page there? (Or am I mixing up with something else?)
Hi Alex. I'm testing thespian in rss2irc, FYI:
http://joyful.com/darcsden/simon/rss2irc/browse/rss2irc.hs#L-114 .
Maybe there's a better way to use it, but for now it brings me one extra thread
and higher memory usage/leakage - an instance grew to 350M overnight where I'd
normally see 50-100M.
> Rustom Mody writes:
>
>> I remember (vaguely) a 'live page' ie where one could enter (into the
>> browser) changes to the diagrams code and see the results immediately.
>> Is that page there? (Or am I mixing up with something else?)
Maybe it was Péter Diviánszky's 'dia' (entirely different to '
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Ryan Newton wrote:
>> Good point. On the other hand, nobody points package authors to the
>> Debian documentation (and Debian also has review for newly uploaded
>> packages, as far as I know).
>
> Re: review process -- Perhaps there would be a use for a review pro
Dear all,
last month's meeting of Haskellers in Munich was a success. Let's
repeat it! We will meet on Wednesday, 26 Oct, at Cafe Puck at Cafe Puck
(www.cafepuck.de). Everybody interested in Haskell or functional
programming is cordially invited. If you can't make it this time, check
out this
>
> Good point. On the other hand, nobody points package authors to the
> Debian documentation (and Debian also has review for newly uploaded
> packages, as far as I know).
Re: review process -- Perhaps there would be a use for a review process
somewhere between haskell-platform and the unwashed
Daniel Fischer wrote:
>> Just for the record, not a newcomer, and has non-spam
>> messages
Conrad Parker wrote:
> There was a recent hotmail exploit, with people reporting their
> account sent spam...
No exploit is needed. It is trivial for an impostor to
seem as if he is sending email from someo
On 24 October 2011 18:15, Ketil Malde wrote:
> Tom Murphy writes:
>
>> Blocking/unsubscribing people based on their email provider seems... sort of
>> impolite or unwelcoming.
>> A greylist could work.
>
> Greylist, as in temporarily refuse a message, and wait for the sending
> mail server to ret
Adam Megacz wrote:
I'm starting to suspect that there are very useful aspects of the
parametricity of System F(C) which can't be taken advantage of by
Haskell in its current state. To put it briefly, case-matching on a
value of type (forall n . T n) forces one to instantiate the "n",
even t
Tom Murphy writes:
> Blocking/unsubscribing people based on their email provider seems... sort of
> impolite or unwelcoming.
> A greylist could work.
Greylist, as in temporarily refuse a message, and wait for the sending
mail server to retry? I don't see how it would work against hijacked
hotma
Rustom Mody writes:
> I remember (vaguely) a 'live page' ie where one could enter (into the
> browser) changes to the diagrams code and see the results immediately.
> Is that page there? (Or am I mixing up with something else?)
Chris Smith's web interface to Ben Lippmeier's Gloss, perhaps?
http:
28 matches
Mail list logo
